Suppr超能文献

用于测量临床正常犬垂直肢体力量的压力步道系统的评估。

Evaluation of a pressure walkway system for measurement of vertical limb forces in clinically normal dogs.

作者信息

Lascelles B Duncan X, Roe Simon C, Smith Eric, Reynolds Lisa, Markham Jacqueline, Marcellin-Little Denis, Bergh Mary Sarah, Budsberg Steven C

机构信息

Comparative Pain Research Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.

出版信息

Am J Vet Res. 2006 Feb;67(2):277-82. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.67.2.277.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare ground reaction forces (GRFs) measured by use of a pressure-sensitive walk-way (PSW) and a force plate (FP) and evaluate weekly variation in the GRFs and static vertical forces in dogs.

ANIMALS

34 clinically normal dogs and 5 research dogs with lameness.

PROCEDURE

GRF data were collected from 5 lame and 14 clinically normal dogs by use of an FP and a PSW. Peak vertical force (PVF), vertical impulse (VI), and velocity measurements (determined by use of photocells and PSW data) were compared between groups. Peak vertical force, VI, stride length, ground phase time (ie, contact time), and static body weight distribution data were collected on 2 occasions, 1 week apart, in 20 different clinically normal dogs by use of a PSW; week-to-week variation in values was evaluated.

RESULTS

Measurements of velocity derived by use of the photocells were not different from those derived by use of the PSW. For any 1 limb, values derived by use of the PSW were significantly lower than values derived with the FP. For values obtained by use of either technique, there were no differences between left and right limbs except for values of PVF measured via PSW in forelimbs. Values of PVF, VI, contact time, stride length, and static weight distribution generated by the PSW did not vary from week to week.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Values for GRFs varied between the FP and PSW. However, data derived by use of PSW were consistent and could be used to evaluate kinetic variables over time in the same dog.

摘要

目的

比较使用压力感应步道(PSW)和测力板(FP)测量的地面反作用力(GRF),并评估犬类GRF和静态垂直力的每周变化情况。

动物

34只临床正常犬和5只患有跛行的实验犬。

步骤

通过使用FP和PSW从5只跛行犬和14只临床正常犬收集GRF数据。比较两组之间的峰值垂直力(PVF)、垂直冲量(VI)和速度测量值(通过光电管和PSW数据确定)。使用PSW在20只不同的临床正常犬中,于相隔1周的两个时间点收集峰值垂直力、VI、步长、地面接触时间(即接触时间)和静态体重分布数据;评估各值的周周变化情况。

结果

通过光电管得出的速度测量值与通过PSW得出的速度测量值没有差异。对于任何一条肢体,使用PSW得出的值均显著低于使用FP得出的值。对于通过任何一种技术获得的值,除了通过PSW测量的前肢PVF值外,左右肢体之间没有差异。PSW产生的PVF、VI、接触时间、步长和静态体重分布值在周与周之间没有变化。

结论及临床意义

FP和PSW得出的GRF值有所不同。然而,使用PSW得出的数据具有一致性,可用于评估同一只犬随时间变化的动力学变量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验