Peterson C C, Siddle D A T
Department of Psychology, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia.
Aust Psychol. 1995 Nov;30(3):187-90. doi: 10.1080/00050069508258931.
There has been increased attention in recent years to the importance of individual privacy and professional confidentiality both in Australia and overseas. At the same time, psychologists' growing research interests in areas such as AIDS, child sexual abuse, and domestic violence have led to new ethical dilemmas over the contract of confidentiality between researchers and their research participants. The present paper discusses a number of issues regarding the ethics of confidentiality in psychological research. Following Bok (1989), the issues are highlighted within the context of four ethical principles that underlie researchers' obligations to preserve confidentiality. These principles are derived from considerations of privacy, loyalty, the pledge of silence, and professional codes of ethical standards. Each of these principles is illustrated with examples taken from recent research. We devote special attention to instances that appear to provide a clash between moral principles.
近年来,在澳大利亚和海外,个人隐私和专业保密的重要性受到了越来越多的关注。与此同时,心理学家对艾滋病、儿童性虐待和家庭暴力等领域的研究兴趣日益浓厚,这导致了研究人员与研究参与者之间保密协议出现了新的伦理困境。本文讨论了心理研究中保密伦理的一些问题。遵循博克(1989年)的观点,这些问题在构成研究人员保密义务基础的四项伦理原则的背景下得到了突出体现。这些原则源自对隐私、忠诚、沉默承诺和职业道德规范的考量。每项原则都用近期研究中的例子进行了说明。我们特别关注那些似乎在道德原则之间产生冲突的情况。
Aust Psychol. 1995-11
Aust Psychol. 1995-11
Ethics Behav. 1997
Aust Psychol. 1995-11
Aust Psychol. 1995-11