文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

心理学研究中的保密问题。

Confidentiality issues in psychological research.

作者信息

Peterson C C, Siddle D A T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia.

出版信息

Aust Psychol. 1995 Nov;30(3):187-90. doi: 10.1080/00050069508258931.


DOI:10.1080/00050069508258931
PMID:17144059
Abstract

There has been increased attention in recent years to the importance of individual privacy and professional confidentiality both in Australia and overseas. At the same time, psychologists' growing research interests in areas such as AIDS, child sexual abuse, and domestic violence have led to new ethical dilemmas over the contract of confidentiality between researchers and their research participants. The present paper discusses a number of issues regarding the ethics of confidentiality in psychological research. Following Bok (1989), the issues are highlighted within the context of four ethical principles that underlie researchers' obligations to preserve confidentiality. These principles are derived from considerations of privacy, loyalty, the pledge of silence, and professional codes of ethical standards. Each of these principles is illustrated with examples taken from recent research. We devote special attention to instances that appear to provide a clash between moral principles.

摘要

近年来,在澳大利亚和海外,个人隐私和专业保密的重要性受到了越来越多的关注。与此同时,心理学家对艾滋病、儿童性虐待和家庭暴力等领域的研究兴趣日益浓厚,这导致了研究人员与研究参与者之间保密协议出现了新的伦理困境。本文讨论了心理研究中保密伦理的一些问题。遵循博克(1989年)的观点,这些问题在构成研究人员保密义务基础的四项伦理原则的背景下得到了突出体现。这些原则源自对隐私、忠诚、沉默承诺和职业道德规范的考量。每项原则都用近期研究中的例子进行了说明。我们特别关注那些似乎在道德原则之间产生冲突的情况。

相似文献

[1]
Confidentiality issues in psychological research.

Aust Psychol. 1995-11

[2]
Ethical issues surrounding human participants research using the Internet.

Ethics Behav. 2003

[3]
Confidentiality in psychological practice: a decrepit concept?

Aust Psychol. 1995-11

[4]
Ethical and legal risks associated with archival research.

Ethics Behav. 1997

[5]
Internet research: an opportunity to revisit classic ethical problems in behavioral research.

Ethics Behav. 2003

[6]
Confidentiality in psychological practice.

Aust Psychol. 1995-11

[7]
Reporting and referring research participants: ethical challenges for investigators studying children and youth.

Ethics Behav. 1994

[8]
What creates the dilemma in ethical dilemmas? Examples from psychological practice.

Ethics Behav. 1992

[9]
The law relating to confidentiality of data acquired by researchers in the biomedical and social sciences.

Univ Tasman Law Rev. 1986

[10]
Ethical issues in research on adolescent depression and suicidal behaviour.

Aust Psychol. 1995-11

引用本文的文献

[1]
Comparing Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Oppositional Defiant Disorder Singly and Together in Terms of Behavioral Problems, Family Conflict, and Cognitive Functions.

Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2018-12-28

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索