Girón Rosa María, Cisneros Carolina, Nakeeb Zaid Al, Hoyos Nieves, Martínez Concha, Ancochea Julio
Servicio de Neumología. Hospital Universitario de la Princesa. Madrid. España.
Med Clin (Barc). 2006 Oct 21;127(15):567-71. doi: 10.1157/13093998.
The objective of our study was to determine the costs saving with the implementing of a home intravenous antibiotic treatment (HIVAT) program for patients with cystic fibrosis and to compare it with the conventional system (inpatient).
Consecutive patients in an adults cystic fibrosis unit were selected who received some days of HIVAT, between January 2002 and December 2004. For the analysis of costs saving of the HIVAT, we used the difference between the total costs of the avoided stay days and the costs generated by the domiciliary therapy (drugs, expendable equipment) and by the ambulatory medicine unit in case the patients were not hospitalized. All patients received a therapy with an intravenous antibiotic for a minimum of 14 days. All these data were provided by the accounting service of the hospital with the aid management Clinical Financier Program (GECLIF).
22 patients with cystic fibrosis needed 85 intravenous antibiotics treatments during the 3 years of the study, of which: 43 cycles were completely domiciliary, 14 inpatient and 28 were combined (hospital and home). The 71 cycles of HIVAT originated 909 days at home, with an average (standard deviation) of 12.80 (4.18) days and 43 treatments in ambulatory medicine unit. The home antibiotic treatments that originated greater cost (3,964.34 Euro) was meropenem (1 g/6 h) i.v. with linezolid (600 mg/12 h) via oral combination during 14 days, and in second place the association of ceftazidime, tobramycine and linezolid, whose cost in cycle of 14 days was of 2464.84 Euro. The average saving cost in the 3 years of study was of 2,647.29 Euro by each cycle of HIVAT and global 197,689.78 Euro.
HIVAT obtained important sanitary costs saving and this was greater every year, not due to the increase of days at home, but due to the rising cost per day of hospital stays every new year.
我们研究的目的是确定实施针对囊性纤维化患者的家庭静脉抗生素治疗(HIVAT)计划所节省的成本,并将其与传统系统(住院治疗)进行比较。
选取2002年1月至2004年12月期间在成人囊性纤维化科室接受过若干天HIVAT治疗的连续患者。为分析HIVAT节省的成本,我们使用避免住院天数的总成本与家庭治疗(药物、一次性设备)以及患者未住院时门诊科室产生的成本之间的差值。所有患者均接受了至少14天的静脉抗生素治疗。所有这些数据均由医院会计服务部门借助临床财务辅助管理程序(GECLIF)提供。
在研究的3年中,22例囊性纤维化患者需要85次静脉抗生素治疗,其中:43个疗程完全在家中进行,14个疗程为住院治疗,28个疗程为联合治疗(住院和在家)。71个HIVAT疗程使患者在家中度过了909天,平均(标准差)为12.80(4.18)天,43次治疗在门诊科室进行。成本最高(3964.34欧元)的家庭抗生素治疗是美罗培南(1g/6小时)静脉注射联合利奈唑胺(600mg/12小时)口服,持续14天,其次是头孢他啶、妥布霉素和利奈唑胺联合使用,其14天疗程的成本为2464.84欧元。在研究的3年中,每个HIVAT疗程平均节省成本2647.29欧元,总计节省197689.78欧元。
HIVAT显著节省了医疗成本,且每年节省的成本都在增加,这并非由于在家治疗天数的增加,而是由于每年住院每日成本的上升。