Wilms Hans-Ulrich, Riedel-Heller Steffi G, Angermeyer Matthias C
Department of Psychiatry, University of Leipzig, Johannisallee, Leipzig, Germany.
Compr Psychiatry. 2007 Jan-Feb;48(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2006.04.001. Epub 2006 May 24.
A representative sample of the Leipzig population aged 75 years and older showed 61.8% of the participants with relevant deficits in their capacity for independent living, according to a combined activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living (ADL/IADL) scale. The quantity and quality of care needed almost exponentially increases above 85 years of age. Looking at potential reasons for ADL/IADL limitations, 44% of variance in single ADL/IADL activities and 75% of the combined ADL/IADL sum score could come from a minimal set of predictor variables. Most important are dementia- or mobility-related declines, but living conditions also explain small but significant amounts of variance. These seem initially impressive, yet analyses showed about half the explained variances shared among the mobility and dementia indicators, limiting the use not only of ADL/IADL sum scores but of many single ADL/IADL items as well. Before deriving specific conclusions from variations in ADL/IADL instruments, one must note that the data suggest that interpretations of covariations--whether for health/mobility or dementia--are useful and substantial only if both indicators/predictors are verified. The information given captures the mobility- and dementia-related variance if ADL/IADL items, facilitating more specific scale developments.
根据日常生活活动/工具性日常生活活动(ADL/IADL)综合量表,莱比锡75岁及以上人群的代表性样本显示,61.8%的参与者在独立生活能力方面存在相关缺陷。85岁以上人群所需护理的数量和质量几乎呈指数级增长。查看ADL/IADL受限的潜在原因,单个ADL/IADL活动中44%的方差以及ADL/IADL综合得分的75%可能来自一组最少的预测变量。最重要的是与痴呆症或行动能力相关的下降,但生活条件也能解释少量但显著的方差。这些结果乍一看令人印象深刻,但分析表明,行动能力和痴呆症指标之间共享了约一半的解释方差,这不仅限制了ADL/IADL综合得分的使用,也限制了许多单个ADL/IADL项目的使用。在从ADL/IADL工具的变化中得出具体结论之前,必须注意到数据表明,只有当两个指标/预测因素都得到证实时,对协变量的解释——无论是健康/行动能力还是痴呆症——才是有用且有实质意义的。如果ADL/IADL项目能够捕捉到与行动能力和痴呆症相关的方差,那么就能促进更具体的量表开发。