• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

进一步验证酒精依赖量表作为严重程度指标的有效性。

Further validation of the alcohol dependence scale as an index of severity.

作者信息

Saxon Andrew J, Kivlahan Daniel R, Doyle Suzanne, Donovan Dennis M

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.

出版信息

J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Jan;68(1):149-56. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.149.

DOI:10.15288/jsad.2007.68.149
PMID:17149529
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Alcohol Dependence Scale (ADS) yields continuous scores purported to reflect the severity of the dependence syndrome. We evaluated the concurrent validity of the ADS as a general measure of severity and the screening accuracy of the total score and subscales to detect Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), physiological dependence.

METHOD

Treatment-seeking, alcohol-dependent individuals entering the Combining Pharmacotherapies and Behavioral Interventions for Alcohol Dependence (COMBINE) Study (N = 1,372; 69% men) completed the ADS, diagnostic interviews, and other measures before randomization. Analyses of variance tested differences between ADS quartiles on alcohol- related measures. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve assessed screening accuracy for DSM-IV physiological dependence (tolerance or withdrawal) or withdrawal alone.

RESULTS

ADS quartiles differed on age, other demographics, and prior treatment episodes. Linear correlation showed moderate to large magnitude associations with alcohol-related self-report measures and most indices of consumption. ADS quartiles differed significantly on proportion with DSM-IV physiological dependence, but AUROC curves indicated that the ADS had limited accuracy as a continuous measure to detect DSMIV physiological dependence (AUROC = .75 [95% confidence interval {CI}: .70-.79] and .67 [95% CI: .60-.74] for men and women, respectively; p = .08) or withdrawal alone (AUROC = .77 [95% CI: .74-.80] and .74 [95% CI: .69-.79] for men and women, respectively; p = .30). Screening accuracy was comparably limited based on ADS subscales reflecting psychoperceptual or psychophysical withdrawal.

CONCLUSIONS

The ADS reflected variation in symptom severity but did not adequately identify physiological dependence or withdrawal in treatment-seeking individuals with DSM-IV alcohol dependence.

摘要

目的

酒精依赖量表(ADS)产生的连续分数据称可反映依赖综合征的严重程度。我们评估了ADS作为严重程度一般测量指标的同时效度,以及总分和分量表检测《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)生理依赖的筛查准确性。

方法

寻求治疗的酒精依赖个体参加酒精依赖联合药物治疗与行为干预研究(COMBINE研究,N = 1372;69%为男性),在随机分组前完成ADS、诊断访谈及其他测量。方差分析检验ADS四分位数在酒精相关测量指标上的差异。受试者工作特征(AUROC)曲线下面积评估DSM-IV生理依赖(耐受性或戒断)或仅戒断的筛查准确性。

结果

ADS四分位数在年龄、其他人口统计学特征及既往治疗经历方面存在差异。线性相关显示与酒精相关的自我报告测量指标及大多数消费指数存在中度至高度关联。ADS四分位数在DSM-IV生理依赖比例上有显著差异,但AUROC曲线表明,作为检测DSM-IV生理依赖的连续测量指标,ADS的准确性有限(男性和女性的AUROC分别为0.75 [95%置信区间{CI}:0.70 - 0.79]和0.67 [95% CI:0.60 - 0.74];p = 0.08),或仅检测戒断时准确性也有限(男性和女性的AUROC分别为0.77 [95% CI:0.74 - 0.80]和0.74 [95% CI:0.69 - 0.79];p = 0.30)。基于反映心理感知或心理生理戒断的ADS分量表,筛查准确性同样有限。

结论

ADS反映了症状严重程度的差异,但在寻求治疗的DSM-IV酒精依赖个体中,未能充分识别出生理依赖或戒断情况。

相似文献

1
Further validation of the alcohol dependence scale as an index of severity.进一步验证酒精依赖量表作为严重程度指标的有效性。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Jan;68(1):149-56. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.149.
2
Concurrent validity of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and AUDIT zones in defining levels of severity among out-patients with alcohol dependence in the COMBINE study.在“联合研究”中,酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)及AUDIT分区在界定酒精依赖门诊患者严重程度水平方面的同时效度。
Addiction. 2006 Dec;101(12):1696-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01606.x.
3
A validation study of the alcohol dependence scale.酒精依赖量表的验证研究。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009 Sep;70(5):689-99. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2009.70.689.
4
Concurrent validity of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in relation to Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) severity levels according to the brief DSM-5 AUD diagnostic assessment screener.根据简短的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版酒精使用障碍(AUD)诊断评估筛查工具,酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)与AUD严重程度水平的同时效度。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;73(7):397-400. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2019.1642382. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
5
The Alcohol Dependence Scale and DSM-5 alcohol use disorder: Severity ratings correspond insufficiently in older patients.酒精依赖量表与 DSM-5 酒精使用障碍:在老年患者中严重程度评定不够对应。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2020 Mar;29(1):e1811. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1811. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
6
An item response analysis of the Alcohol Dependence Scale in treatment-seeking alcoholics.寻求治疗的酗酒者酒精依赖量表的项目反应分析。
J Stud Alcohol. 2003 Jan;64(1):127-36. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2003.64.127.
7
Item functioning of the alcohol dependence scale in a high-risk sample.酒精依赖量表在高危样本中的项目功能。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003 Nov 24;72(2):183-92. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(03)00199-6.
8
Diagnostic validity of the MAST and the alcohol dependence scale in the assessment of DSM-III alcohol disorders.MAST与酒精依赖量表在评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版酒精障碍中的诊断效度
J Stud Alcohol. 1990 Nov;51(6):506-13. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1990.51.506.
9
The TWEAK is weak for alcohol screening among female Veterans Affairs outpatients.对于退伍军人事务部女性门诊患者的酒精筛查而言,肿瘤坏死因子样弱凋亡诱导因子(TWEAK)作用有限。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003 Dec;27(12):1971-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000099262.50094.98.
10
Clinical relevance of the distinction between alcohol dependence with and without a physiological component.伴有和不伴有生理成分的酒精依赖之间区别的临床相关性。
Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Jun;155(6):733-40. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.6.733.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical value of predicting relapse within 3 months in alcohol-dependent patients using fNIRS in verbal fluency task.在言语流畅性任务中使用功能近红外光谱技术预测酒精依赖患者3个月内复发的临床价值。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 12;15(1):5283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89775-7.
2
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive behavioral therapy treatment in alcohol-dependent patients: A randomized, double-blind sham-controlled multicenter clinical trial.重复经颅磁刺激联合认知行为疗法治疗酒精依赖患者:一项随机、双盲、假刺激对照的多中心临床试验。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 4;13:935491. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.935491. eCollection 2022.
3
Effect of High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Visual Selective Attention in Male Patients With Alcohol Use Disorder After the Acute Withdrawal.
高频重复经颅磁刺激对酒精使用障碍男性患者急性戒断后视觉选择性注意的影响
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 29;13:869014. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.869014. eCollection 2022.
4
Validation and Factor Analysis of the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) in the Chinese Population.强迫性饮酒量表(OCDS)在中国人群中的效度验证与因素分析
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 2;12:770860. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.770860. eCollection 2021.
5
Validity and measurement invariance of the Addictions Neuroclinical Assessment incentive salience domain among treatment-seekers with alcohol use disorder.酒精使用障碍寻求治疗者中,成瘾神经临床评估动机显著性领域的效度与测量不变性。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Mar;122:108227. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108227. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
6
The Alcohol Dependence Scale and DSM-5 alcohol use disorder: Severity ratings correspond insufficiently in older patients.酒精依赖量表与 DSM-5 酒精使用障碍:在老年患者中严重程度评定不够对应。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2020 Mar;29(1):e1811. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1811. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
7
Association between copy number variation losses and alcohol dependence across African American and European American ethnic groups.非裔美国人和欧裔美国人种族群体中拷贝数变异缺失与酒精依赖之间的关联。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014 May;38(5):1266-74. doi: 10.1111/acer.12364. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
8
Factor Structure Validation of the Alcohol Dependence Scale in a Heavy Drinking College Sample.重度饮酒大学生样本中酒精依赖量表的因子结构验证
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2011 Jul 1;33(4):523-530. doi: 10.1007/s10862-011-9239-4.
9
Identification and risk-stratification of problem alcohol drinkers with minor trauma in the emergency department.在急诊科对有轻度创伤的问题饮酒者进行识别和风险分层。
West J Emerg Med. 2010 May;11(2):133-7.