Suppr超能文献

评估执业医师实践变化的措施。

Measures for assessing practice change in medical practitioners.

作者信息

Hakkennes Sharon, Green Sally

机构信息

School of Physiotherapy, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2006 Dec 6;1:29. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are increasing numbers of randomised trials and systematic reviews examining the efficacy of interventions designed to bring about a change in clinical practice. The findings of this research are being used to guide strategies to increase the uptake of evidence into clinical practice. Knowledge of the outcomes measured by these trials is vital not only for the interpretation and application of the work done to date, but also to inform future research in this expanding area of endeavour and to assist in collation of results in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

METHODS

The objective of this review was to identify methods used to measure change in the clinical practices of health professionals following an intervention aimed at increasing the uptake of evidence into practice. All published trials included in a recent, comprehensive Health Technology Assessment of interventions to implement clinical practice guidelines and change clinical practice (n = 228) formed the sample for this study. Using a standardised data extraction form, one reviewer (SH), extracted the relevant information from the methods and/or results sections of the trials.

RESULTS

Measures of a change of health practitioner behaviour were the most common, with 88.8% of trials using these as outcome measures. Measures that assessed change at a patient level, either actual measures of change or surrogate measures of change, were used in 28.8% and 36.7% of studies (respectively). Health practitioners' knowledge and attitudes were assessed in 22.8% of the studies and changes at an organisational level were assessed in 17.6%.

CONCLUSION

Most trials of interventions aimed at changing clinical practice measured the effect of the intervention at the level of the practitioner, i.e. did the practitioner change what they do, or has their knowledge of and/or attitude toward that practice changed? Less than one-third of the trials measured, whether or not any change in practice, resulted in a change in the ultimate end-point of patient health status.

摘要

背景

越来越多的随机试验和系统评价在检验旨在改变临床实践的干预措施的疗效。这项研究的结果正被用于指导将证据纳入临床实践的策略。了解这些试验所测量的结果不仅对于解释和应用迄今所做的工作至关重要,而且对于为这一不断扩大的研究领域的未来研究提供信息以及协助系统评价和荟萃分析中的结果整理也至关重要。

方法

本综述的目的是确定在旨在将证据纳入实践的干预措施后,用于测量卫生专业人员临床实践变化的方法。最近一项关于实施临床实践指南和改变临床实践的干预措施的全面卫生技术评估中纳入的所有已发表试验(n = 228)构成了本研究的样本。一名评审员(SH)使用标准化的数据提取表,从试验的方法和/或结果部分提取相关信息。

结果

卫生从业人员行为变化的测量是最常见的,88.8%的试验将其用作结果测量。分别有28.8%和36.7%的研究使用了在患者层面评估变化的测量方法,即实际变化测量或变化的替代测量。22.8%的研究评估了卫生从业人员的知识和态度,17.6%的研究评估了组织层面的变化。

结论

大多数旨在改变临床实践的干预试验在从业人员层面测量了干预效果,即从业人员是否改变了他们的行为,或者他们对该实践的知识和/或态度是否发生了变化?不到三分之一的试验测量了实践中的任何变化是否导致了患者健康状况这一最终终点的变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a354/1712347/e8d030719161/1748-5908-1-29-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验