Flammang D, Renirie L, Begemann M, van Krieken F
Angouleme General Hospital, Saint Michel, France.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Jun;14(6):1040-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb04155.x.
VDD stimulation using a single catheter for atrial sensing and ventricular sensing and pacing has become a reality. In order to compare the quality of the cavitary atrial electrogram (AEG) and to determine the intraatrial P wave direction and conduction time (CT), we compared, in an acute study, three different types of atrial electrode systems using four different leads, in 53 patients in sinus rhythm. The three electrode systems were: (1) one experimental system with quadripolar orthogonal electrodes using the Goldreyer concept; (2) one experimental system with quadripolar whole ring electrodes; (3) two systems with diagonally oriented half-ring electrodes, one experimental quadripolar and one bipolar CCS commercial (Polysafe A-Track lead). For the experimental systems, the four electrodes forming two independent bipolar pairs were situated on the intraatrial floating portion of a single lead and one supplemental electrode was distally positioned in the right ventricular apex. Bipolar AEGs were recorded at the high and at the low levels of the right atrium. For the CCS lead, the single bipolar AEG was recorded at the high level of the right atrium only. The highest AEG amplitude and the highest values for ventricular far-field rejection were provided by both diagonally oriented half-ring electrodes at the high atrial level and by the whole ring electrodes at the low atrial level. For both atrial levels, the orthogonal electrode system provided the smallest AEG amplitudes, the highest ventricular electrogram amplitudes, and therefore, the smallest values for ventricular far-field rejection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
