Hanson A E
Classics Department, Yale University, USA.
Stud Anc Med. 2004;27:277-304.
This contribution examines the gynaecological sections in the fifth book of the Aphorismi, juxtaposing individual gnômai to similar information about women's diseases related elsewhere in the Corpus Hippocraticum. Although no startling contradictions exist between Aphorismi 5.28-63 and what is said in the major gynaecological treatises, the verbal similarities are not so striking as those between some Aphorismi and gnomic sections of Epidemiae. Further, it is not the major gynaecologies, but the treatise De sterilibus that displays an interest in birth prognoses similar to views offered at Aphorismi 41, 42, 44, 46, 48, 59. Finally, Galen's remarks in his commentary to the Aphorismi and elsewhere, coupled with what Soranus says in his Gynaecia about Hippocratic gynaecology, likewise underscore the fact that both authors quote from and paraphrase Aphorismi more readily than the major Hippocratic gynaecologies, such as De morbis mulierum.
本论文探讨了《格言集》第五卷中的妇科章节，将其中的个别格言与《希波克拉底文集》其他地方有关女性疾病的类似信息并列对照。虽然《格言集》5.28 - 63与主要妇科论著中的内容之间不存在惊人的矛盾，但文字上的相似之处并不像《格言集》的某些部分与《流行病学》中的格言部分那样显著。此外，并非主要的妇科论著，而是《论不孕》这部论著表现出对生育预后的关注，类似于《格言集》41、42、44、46、48、59中提出的观点。最后，盖伦在其对《格言集》的评注及其他地方的论述，再加上索拉努斯在其《妇科》中关于希波克拉底妇科的说法，同样强调了这样一个事实，即这两位作者引用和意译《格言集》的频率比引用和意译诸如《女性疾病》等主要希波克拉底妇科论著的频率更高。
