• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Passing it on: should health care professionals be permitted to disclose patients' genetic information to their reproductive partners?

作者信息

Bober Agata

机构信息

Faculty of Law, Monash University.

出版信息

J Law Med. 2006 Nov;14(2):262-81.

PMID:17153530
Abstract

This article considers whether Australian law should permit health care professionals to disclose patients' genetic information to their reproductive partners without the patients' consent. The issue is addressed with reference to four genetic disorders (Huntington Disease, Familial Adenomatous Polyposis, Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2A and Cystic Fibrosis) which illustrate differences in inheritance traits and availability of effective treatments. The article explores the familial nature of these disorders and the notion that genetic information has implications which extend beyond the individual patient to third parties such as reproductive partners. It addresses the opinions of legal academics and regulatory bodies regarding the potential amendment of Australian laws to permit such disclosure. Ultimately, it is submitted that the application of current laws regarding medical information to the needs of genetics is unlikely to generate adequate results. To allow for a more appropriate response to this debate, health care professionals' duties to patients should be qualified when it concerns reproductive partners.

摘要

相似文献

1
Passing it on: should health care professionals be permitted to disclose patients' genetic information to their reproductive partners?
J Law Med. 2006 Nov;14(2):262-81.
2
An exploration of the legal and socio-ethical implications of predictive genetic testing of children.对儿童预测性基因检测的法律及社会伦理影响的探讨。
Aust J Fam Law. 2004 Jul;18(2):147-69.
3
Use and disclosure of genetic information without consent: a decision-making tool for health practitioners--who, when, why and how?未经同意使用和披露遗传信息:卫生从业者的决策工具——谁、何时、为何以及如何?
Intern Med J. 2011 Aug;41(8):634-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02515.x.
4
The argument against a physician's duty to warn for genetic diseases: the conflicts created by Safer v. Estate of Pack.
J Health Care Law Policy. 1998;1(2):437-53.
5
Genetic professionals' reports of nondisclosure of genetic risk information within families.遗传专业人员关于家庭内部未披露遗传风险信息的报告。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2005 May;13(5):556-62. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201394.
6
What should the law say about disclosure of genetic information to relatives?法律对于向亲属披露基因信息应该作何规定?
J Health Care Law Policy. 1998;1(2):373-90.
7
Diagnostic testing of genetic disorders: limiting the scope of patent claims through disclosure requirements.遗传性疾病的诊断测试:通过披露要求限制专利权利要求的范围。
J Law Med. 2006 Aug;14(1):110-26.
8
Patient confidentiality vs disclosure of inheritable risk: a survey-based study.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006 Oct;106(10):615-20.
9
Genetic competencies essential for health care professionals in primary care.基层医疗保健专业人员必备的遗传能力。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005 May-Jun;50(3):177-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.02.002.
10
Israeli nurses and genetic information disclosure.以色列护士与基因信息披露。
Nurs Ethics. 2007 May;14(3):280-94. doi: 10.1177/0969733007075862.