Suppr超能文献

成人威尔逊病患者肝移植的修订版国王学院评分

Revised King's College score for liver transplantation in adult patients with Wilson's disease.

作者信息

Petrasek Jan, Jirsa Milan, Sperl Jan, Kozak Libor, Taimr Pavel, Spicak Julius, Filip Karel, Trunecka Pavel

机构信息

Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Liver Transpl. 2007 Jan;13(1):55-61. doi: 10.1002/lt.20920.

Abstract

Fulminant Wilson's disease (WD) is almost invariably fatal, and liver transplantation is the only life-saving treatment. Decompensated chronic WD usually responds to chelation therapy. Our aim was to validate 3 published scoring systems for deciding between chelation treatment and liver transplantation in patients with chronic decompensated and fulminant WD. Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, as well as WD prognostic index (WPI) and its recently revised version (RWPI) were evaluated as predictors of the safety for chelation therapy. A group of 14 adult patients with decompensated chronic WD who improved on penicillamine treatment were compared with 21 patients with fulminant WD. The diagnosis of WD was based on increased urinary copper excretion and confirmed by elevated liver copper content and/or mutation analysis of the WD gene. The MELD score, WPI, and RWPI were calculated for all patients with WD. The accuracy of the MELD score, WPI, and RWPI for prediction of response to chelation therapy in patients with decompensated chronic WD was 0.968, 0.980, and 0.993, respectively. None of the decompensated chronic WD patients had a MELD score >30, RWPI >11, or WPI >7. RWPI showed the highest accuracy and the lowest false negativity compared with WPI and MELD. In conclusion, our data indicate that RWPI, originally proposed for pediatric patients, is also useful for adults.

摘要

暴发性威尔逊病(WD)几乎总是致命的,肝移植是唯一的挽救生命的治疗方法。失代偿性慢性WD通常对螯合疗法有反应。我们的目的是验证3种已发表的评分系统,以确定慢性失代偿性和暴发性WD患者是采用螯合治疗还是肝移植。评估终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分以及WD预后指数(WPI)及其最近修订版(RWPI)作为螯合疗法安全性的预测指标。将一组14例接受青霉胺治疗后病情改善的失代偿性慢性WD成年患者与21例暴发性WD患者进行比较。WD的诊断基于尿铜排泄增加,并通过肝铜含量升高和/或WD基因的突变分析得到证实。计算所有WD患者的MELD评分、WPI和RWPI。MELD评分、WPI和RWPI预测失代偿性慢性WD患者对螯合疗法反应的准确性分别为0.968、0.980和0.993。失代偿性慢性WD患者中没有MELD评分>30、RWPI>11或WPI>7的。与WPI和MELD相比,RWPI显示出最高的准确性和最低的假阴性。总之,我们的数据表明,最初为儿科患者提出的RWPI对成人也有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验