Kabitz Hans-Joachim, Walker David, Walterspacher Stephan, Windisch Wolfram
Department of Pneumology, University Hospital Freiburg, Killianstrasse 5, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2007 Jun 15;156(3):276-82. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2006.10.007. Epub 2006 Oct 29.
The present study hypothesized that twitch mouth pressure (TwPmo) can reliably predict intrathoracic pressure swings reflected by twitch esophageal pressure (TwPes) using a controlled and automated trigger technique. TwPmo, TwPes, and transdiaphragmatic pressure (TwPdi) following bilateral anterior magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation were measured in 21 healthy subjects using an inspiratory pressure trigger (0.5kPa, experiment 1), an expiratory pressure trigger (0.5kPa, experiment 2), an inspiratory flow trigger (40ml/s, experiment 3), and no trigger at relaxed functional residual capacity (experiment 4). TwPmo and TwPes were correlated as follows: r=0.99, p<0.0001 (experiment 1); r=0.67, p=0.001 (experiment 2); r=0.96, p<0.0001 (experiment 3); no correlation (experiment 4). Bland and Altman analysis revealed most narrow limits of agreement for TwPmo and TwPes in experiment 1: bias (range) 0.15kPa (-0.03 to 0.32). TwPmo is an excellent predictor for TwPes when using a fully automated and controlled inspiratory pressure trigger. Thus, measurement of TwPmo could become a standard means assessing inspiratory muscle strength.
本研究假设,使用一种可控的自动触发技术,抽搐口压(TwPmo)能够可靠地预测由抽搐食管压(TwPes)反映的胸内压波动。在21名健康受试者中,采用吸气压力触发(0.5kPa,实验1)、呼气压力触发(0.5kPa,实验2)、吸气流量触发(40ml/s,实验3)以及在功能残气量放松状态下不使用触发(实验4)的方式,测量双侧膈神经前支磁刺激后的TwPmo、TwPes和跨膈压(TwPdi)。TwPmo和TwPes的相关性如下:r = 0.99,p < 0.0001(实验1);r = 0.67,p = 0.001(实验2);r = 0.96,p < 0.0001(实验3);无相关性(实验4)。Bland和Altman分析显示,实验1中TwPmo和TwPes的一致性界限最窄:偏差(范围)0.15kPa(-0.03至0.32)。当使用全自动且可控的吸气压力触发时,TwPmo是TwPes的优秀预测指标。因此,TwPmo的测量可能成为评估吸气肌力量的标准方法。