Villareal Dennis T, Fontana Luigi, Weiss Edward P, Racette Susan B, Steger-May Karen, Schechtman Kenneth B, Klein Samuel, Holloszy John O
Division of Geriatrics and Nutritional Sciences, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(22):2502-10. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.22.2502.
Bone loss often accompanies weight loss induced by caloric restriction (CR), but whether bone loss accompanies similar weight loss induced by exercise (EX) is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that EX-induced weight loss is associated with less bone loss compared with CR-induced weight loss.
Forty-eight adults (30 women; 18 men; mean +/- SD age, 57 +/- 3 years; and mean +/- SD body mass index, 27 +/- 2 kg/m2) were randomized to 1 of 3 groups for 1 year: CR group (n = 19), regular EX group (n = 19), or a healthy lifestyle (HL) control group (n = 10). Primary outcome measure was change in hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD). Secondary outcomes were bone markers and hormones.
Body weight decreased similarly in the CR and EX groups (10.7% +/- 6.3% [-8.2 +/- 4.8 kg] vs 8.4% +/- 6.3% [-6.7 +/- 5.6 kg]; P = .21), whereas weight did not change in the HL group (-1.2% +/- 2.5% [-0.9 +/- 2.0 kg]). Compared with the HL group, the CR group had decreases in BMD at the total hip (-2.2% +/- 3.1% vs 1.2% +/- 2.1%; P = .02) and intertrochanter (-2.1% +/- 3.4% vs 1.7 +/- 2.8%; P = .03). The CR group had a decrease in spine BMD (-2.2% +/- 3.3%; P = .009). Despite weight loss, the EX group did not demonstrate a decrease in BMD at any site. Body weight changes correlated with BMD changes in the CR (R = 0.61; P = .007) but not in the EX group. Bone turnover increased in both CR and EX groups.
CR-induced weight loss, but not EX-induced weight loss, is associated with reductions in BMD at clinically important sites of fracture. These data suggest that EX should be an important component of a weight loss program to offset adverse effects of CR on bone.
骨质流失常伴随热量限制(CR)引起的体重减轻,但运动(EX)引起的类似体重减轻是否会伴随骨质流失尚不清楚。我们检验了这样一个假设,即与CR引起的体重减轻相比,EX引起的体重减轻与较少的骨质流失相关。
48名成年人(30名女性;18名男性;平均±标准差年龄,57±3岁;平均±标准差体重指数,27±2kg/m²)被随机分为3组中的1组,为期1年:CR组(n = 19)、规律EX组(n = 19)或健康生活方式(HL)对照组(n = 10)。主要结局指标是髋部和脊柱骨密度(BMD)的变化。次要结局是骨标志物和激素。
CR组和EX组的体重下降相似(分别为10.7%±6.3%[-8.2±4.8kg]和8.4%±6.3%[-6.7±5.6kg];P = 0.21),而HL组体重未变化(-1.2%±2.5%[-0.9±2.0kg])。与HL组相比,CR组全髋部BMD降低(-2.2%±3.1%对1.2%±2.1%;P = 0.02),转子间BMD降低(-2.1%±3.4%对1.7±2.8%;P = 0.03)。CR组脊柱BMD降低(-2.2%±3.3%;P = 0.009)。尽管体重减轻,但EX组在任何部位的BMD均未降低。体重变化与CR组的BMD变化相关(R = 0.61;P = 0.007),但与EX组无关。CR组和EX组的骨转换均增加。
CR引起的体重减轻而非EX引起的体重减轻与临床上重要骨折部位的BMD降低有关。这些数据表明,EX应成为体重减轻计划的重要组成部分,以抵消CR对骨骼的不利影响。