Suppr超能文献

专家进行的手指比例(2D:4D)测量的重复性和观察者间误差。

Repeatability and interobserver error of digit ratio (2D:4D) measurements made by experts.

作者信息

Voracek Martin, Manning John T, Dressler Stefan G

机构信息

Department of Basic Psychological Research, School of Psychology, University of Vienna, A-1010 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Am J Hum Biol. 2007 Jan-Feb;19(1):142-6. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20581.

Abstract

The second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) is sexually differentiated (lower in men than in women), a likely biomarker for organizational (permanent) effects of prenatal testosterone, and a correlate of many sex-dependent, hormonally influenced traits and phenotypes. The extent of 2D:4D measurement repeatability across different research groups is unknown. This study assessed the repeatability and interobserver error of 2D:4D measurements made by 17 experts (researchers who have contributed to the 2D:4D literature). Results indicate that 2D:4D, because it is a ratio variable, is notably less precisely measurable than finger length. Absolute-agreement intraclass correlation coefficients for these traits are about 0.75 vs. about 0.95, respectively. Associations of 2D:4D with target traits were usually of small size; measurement unreliability attenuates effects. This may explain some null findings and replication failures encountered in 2D:4D research. However, agreement levels are still sufficient to permit conclusions about findings from different research groups. One implication of this is that the marked geographical and population differences in typical 2D:4D levels, as reported in the literature, are veridical, and not due to divergent measurement habits across research groups. Some practical recommendations for 2D:4D measurement are offered.

摘要

食指与无名指长度比(2D:4D)存在性别差异(男性低于女性),它可能是产前睾酮组织化(永久性)效应的生物标志物,也是许多受性别和激素影响的性状及表型的相关指标。不同研究团队间2D:4D测量的可重复性程度尚不清楚。本研究评估了17位专家(对2D:4D文献有贡献的研究人员)进行的2D:4D测量的可重复性和观察者间误差。结果表明,由于2D:4D是一个比值变量,其测量精度明显低于手指长度。这些性状的绝对一致性组内相关系数分别约为0.75和0.95。2D:4D与目标性状的关联通常较小;测量的不可靠性会减弱效应。这可能解释了2D:4D研究中遇到的一些阴性结果和重复失败的情况。然而,一致性水平仍足以对不同研究团队的结果得出结论。这意味着,文献中报道的典型2D:4D水平在地理和人群上的显著差异是真实的,而非不同研究团队测量习惯不同所致。本文还提供了一些2D:4D测量的实用建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验