Armstrong David, Ogden Jane
King's College, London, London SE11 6SP.
Sociol Health Illn. 2006 Nov;28(7):951-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00514.x.
Despite increasing interest over the last 30 years in individual variations in clinical practice, various research studies have thrown only limited light on either understanding or changing doctors' behaviour. This qualitative study explored a sample of British general practitioners' accounts of the influences on their prescribing, and identified the locus of the problem in their defence of professional identity through clinical autonomy, a tactic that precluded use of more customary change agents such as line management and economic incentives. The study identified two mechanisms, clinical etiquette and clinical experimentation, however, that enabled change to occur within the constraints imposed by the commitment to clinical autonomy.
尽管在过去30年里,人们对临床实践中的个体差异越来越感兴趣,但各种研究对理解或改变医生行为的阐释都很有限。这项定性研究探讨了一组英国全科医生关于影响其处方行为的描述,并通过临床自主性来维护职业身份,确定了问题所在,这一策略排除了使用诸如直线管理和经济激励等更常见的变革因素。然而,该研究确定了两种机制,即临床礼仪和临床实验,它们能够在对临床自主性的承诺所施加的限制内促成变革。