Seemayer Christian A, Gaspert Ariana, Nickeleit Volker, Mihatsch Michael J
Institute for Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Schönbeinstrasse 40, CH-4003 Basel, Switzerland.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Feb;22(2):568-76. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl594. Epub 2006 Dec 12.
Detection of C4d along peritubular capillaries (PTC) in renal allograft biopsies is an independent prognostic marker of poor long-term graft survival. It is typically associated with circulating donor-specific antibodies. Since only little information is available on the best technique to stain C4d, we compared the two methods most often used for detecting C4d in renal allograft specimens.
We investigated the expression of C4d along PTC in 64 renal allograft biopsies using a monoclonal antibody (Quidel) and immunofluorescence for frozen (F-IF) and a polyclonal antibody (Biomedica) and immunohistochemistry for formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (P-IHC) tissue samples. We compared the staining extent (diffuse, focal, minimal, no staining) in frozen and paraffin sections and evaluated the intra- and inter-observer concordance rates using kappa statistics. In addition, we determined the inter-observer concordance in 240 paraffin-embedded biopsies of a multi-centre study.
The inter- and intra-investigator concordance rate (kappa = 0.9) of analysing the C4d expression by F-IF was excellent. In contrast, the detection of C4d by P-IHC demonstrated a substantially lower prevalence and extent of C4d expression with a lower intra- and inter-observer concordance rate (kappa = 0.3). Only 69% of diffuse and 13% of focal C4d-expressing cases were in line classified by F-IF and P-IHC. On average, the estimated area of C4d-positive PTC in the diffuse group was 36% lower by P-IHC than by F-IF. The inter-observer concordance rate in paraffin of the 64 renal biopsies and the multi-centre study was good, but not perfect (kappa = 0.57 or 0.67).
C4d staining determined on frozen tissue samples using F-IF with a monoclonal antibody appears to be better suited for diagnostic as well as research purposes. Future studies should correlate C4d staining patterns with circulating donor-specific antibodies.
肾移植活检中沿肾小管周围毛细血管(PTC)检测C4d是移植肾长期存活不良的独立预后标志物。它通常与循环供体特异性抗体相关。由于关于C4d染色的最佳技术的信息很少,我们比较了肾移植标本中最常用于检测C4d的两种方法。
我们使用单克隆抗体(Quidel)和免疫荧光法检测64例肾移植活检标本中沿PTC的C4d表达(冷冻组织的F-IF法),以及使用多克隆抗体(Biomedica)和免疫组化法检测福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织样本(P-IHC法)。我们比较了冷冻切片和石蜡切片中的染色程度(弥漫性、局灶性、最小染色、无染色),并使用kappa统计评估观察者内和观察者间的一致性率。此外,我们在一项多中心研究的240例石蜡包埋活检标本中确定了观察者间的一致性。
通过F-IF分析C4d表达的研究者间和研究者内一致性率(kappa = 0.9)极佳。相比之下,P-IHC检测C4d显示C4d表达的患病率和程度明显较低,观察者内和观察者间一致性率较低(kappa = 0.3)。F-IF和P-IHC对弥漫性C4d表达病例的分类一致率仅为69%,局灶性C4d表达病例为13%。平均而言,弥漫性组中P-IHC检测的C4d阳性PTC估计面积比F-IF法低36%。64例肾活检标本石蜡切片和多中心研究中的观察者间一致性率良好,但并不完美(kappa = 0.57或0.67)。
使用单克隆抗体通过F-IF在冷冻组织样本上进行的C4d染色似乎更适合诊断及研究目的。未来的研究应将C4d染色模式与循环供体特异性抗体进行关联。