Sheehy M J
Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991 Jun;5(2):341-55. doi: 10.1016/s0950-351x(05)80131-4.
T cell defined epitopes on class II HLA molecules (epitopes distinguishable by T cells but not by antibodies) seem to be important determinants of IDDM susceptibility/resistance. Although HLA-DR4 is associated with IDDM in many populations, DR4-positive HLA haplotypes vary greatly (relative risk from greater than 10 to less than 1). This variation seems to depend on both the DQ allele and T cell defined subtypes of the DR4 allele. These IDDM associated alleles at the two loci (DQB1 and DRB1) are not correlated with each other in the healthy population, so they clearly are independent risk factors. HLA-DR2 has universally been associated with lack of IDDM, and seems to be protective. However, not all DR2 haplotypes protect, and the protection or lack of protection correlates with T cell defined subtypes of DR2. In this case, however, the DR2 subtypes do correlate with DQ alleles, so it is unclear which locus (loci) is (are) actually affecting the disease process. It may be significant that, for both DR2 and DR4, only the more protective subtypes have arginine at amino acid position 71. Other portions of the DR beta chain are clearly important, however. Although TCR alpha and beta seemed to be promising candidates for additional IDDM susceptibility genes, in fact the various TCR alpha and beta haplotypes are equal, or nearly equal, with regard to IDDM susceptibility. The importance of HLA alleles in IDDM susceptibility, and the lack of importance of TCR alpha and beta alleles, may be due to the different means by which the HLA and TCR molecules achieve antigen binding diversity: HLA molecules by multiple loci and allelic diversity, and TCR molecules by the tremendous diversity that can be generated from a single TCR allele during T cell maturation.
II类HLA分子上T细胞定义的表位(可被T细胞区分但不能被抗体区分的表位)似乎是IDDM易感性/抗性的重要决定因素。尽管HLA - DR4在许多人群中与IDDM相关,但DR4阳性的HLA单倍型差异很大(相对风险从大于10到小于1)。这种差异似乎取决于DQ等位基因和DR4等位基因的T细胞定义亚型。在健康人群中,这两个基因座(DQB1和DRB1)处与IDDM相关的等位基因彼此不相关,因此它们显然是独立的风险因素。HLA - DR2普遍与IDDM缺乏相关,似乎具有保护作用。然而,并非所有DR2单倍型都具有保护作用,其保护作用或缺乏保护作用与DR2的T细胞定义亚型相关。然而,在这种情况下,DR2亚型确实与DQ等位基因相关,因此尚不清楚哪个基因座实际上正在影响疾病进程。对于DR2和DR4而言,可能重要的是只有更具保护作用的亚型在氨基酸位置71处具有精氨酸。然而,DRβ链的其他部分显然也很重要。尽管TCRα和β似乎是IDDM其他易感基因的有希望的候选者,但事实上,就IDDM易感性而言,各种TCRα和β单倍型是相等的或几乎相等的。HLA等位基因在IDDM易感性中的重要性以及TCRα和β等位基因的不重要性,可能是由于HLA和TCR分子实现抗原结合多样性的不同方式:HLA分子通过多个基因座和等位基因多样性,而TCR分子通过T细胞成熟过程中单个TCR等位基因可产生的巨大多样性。