Heckler R, Baillot A, Engelmann H, Neumeier E, Windorfer A
Niedersächsisches Landesgesundheitsamt, Hannover, Germany.
Intervirology. 2007;50(1):58-62. doi: 10.1159/000096314. Epub 2006 Nov 24.
The aim of this serological study was to demonstrate the extent to which antibodies react against subsequent drift variants, after vaccination with split vaccine (Fluarix). Antibody titers have been determined by hemagglutination inhibition test (HI) against different influenza A and B drift variants in sera from three past multicenter trials. Individuals of two different age groups, i.e. 18-60 years and above 60 years, were enrolled. Vaccine components influenza A/H1N1 and influenza B of Fluarix show a high degree of cross immunogenicity against subsequent homologous drift variants. The genetically more variable component influenza A/H3N2 shows somewhat lower protection rates. High levels of cross immunogenicity were found between the variants of influenza A/Panama/2007/99 (H3N2) and influenza A/Wyoming/3/2003 (H3N2). The results demonstrate that in situations where drift variants emerge too late to be included in the influenza vaccine formulation, the cross-protection conferred must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
这项血清学研究的目的是证明接种裂解疫苗(Fluarix)后,抗体对后续漂移变异株的反应程度。通过血凝抑制试验(HI)测定了来自过去三项多中心试验血清中针对不同甲型和乙型流感漂移变异株的抗体滴度。招募了两个不同年龄组的个体,即18至60岁以及60岁以上。Fluarix疫苗的甲型H1N1和乙型流感成分对后续同源漂移变异株显示出高度的交叉免疫原性。遗传变异性更高的甲型H3N2成分显示出略低的保护率。在甲型/巴拿马/2007/99(H3N2)和甲型/怀俄明/3/2003(H3N2)流感变异株之间发现了高水平的交叉免疫原性。结果表明,在漂移变异株出现太晚而无法纳入流感疫苗配方的情况下,必须逐案评估所提供的交叉保护作用。