A life and death dilemma..
作者信息
Coghlan Andy
出版信息
New Sci. 2006;192(2574):8-9. doi: 10.1016/s0262-4079(06)60756-2.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
A life and death dilemma..
New Sci. 2006;192(2574):8-9. doi: 10.1016/s0262-4079(06)60756-2.
2
Artificial-blood study has critics seeing red.
Chron High Educ. 2006 Jun 16;52(41):A17.
3
Trials and errors: barriers to oversight of research conducted under the emergency research consent waiver.
IRB. 2006 Mar-Apr;28(2):16-9.
4
The meaning of community consultation.
Am J Bioeth. 2006 May-Jun;6(3):30-2; discussion W46-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160600685804.
5
Rules is rules.
Am J Bioeth. 2006 May-Jun;6(3):40-1; discussion W49-50. doi: 10.1080/15265160600685929.
6
An open letter to institutional review boards considering Northfield Laboratories' PolyHeme trial.
Am J Bioeth. 2006 May-Jun;6(3):18-21. doi: 10.1080/15265160600685580.
7
Acting out of ethics: what the open letter asks.
Am J Bioeth. 2006 May-Jun;6(3):41-3; discussion W49-50. doi: 10.1080/15265160600685937.
8
Unproven or unsatisfactory versus equipoise in emergency research with waived consent.
Am J Bioeth. 2006 May-Jun;6(3):44-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160600685952.
9
What treatments are "satisfactory?" divining regulatory intent and an ethical basis for exception to informed consent for emergency research.
Am J Bioeth. 2006 May-Jun;6(3):24-6; discussion W49-50. doi: 10.1080/15265160600685739.
10
Emergency research and consent: keeping the exception from undermining the rule.
Am J Bioeth. 2006 May-Jun;6(3):36-7; discussion W49-50. doi: 10.1080/15265160600685879.
Zotero 插件