Schwarze P E, Ovrevik J, Låg M, Refsnes M, Nafstad P, Hetland R B, Dybing E
Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2006 Oct;25(10):559-79. doi: 10.1177/096032706072520.
Identifying the ambient particulate matter (PM) fractions or constituents, critically involved in eliciting adverse health effects, is crucial to the implementation of more cost-efficient abatement strategies to improve air quality. This review focuses on the importance of different particle properties for PM-induced effects, and whether there is consistency in the results from epidemiological and experimental studies. An evident problem for such comparisons is that epidemiological and experimental data on the effects of specific components of ambient PM are limited. Despite this, some conclusions can be drawn. With respect to the importance of the PM size-fractions, experimental and epidemiological studies are somewhat conflicting, but there seems to be a certain consistency in that the coarse fraction (PM10-2.5) has an effect that should not be neglected. Better exposure characterization may improve the consistency between the results from experimental and epidemiological studies, in particular for ultrafine particles. Experimental data indicate that surface area is an important metric, but composition may play an even greater role in eliciting effects. The consistency between epidemiological and experimental findings for specific PM-components appears most convincing for metals, which seem to be important for the development of both pulmonary and cardiovascular disease. Metals may also be involved in PM-induced allergic sensitization, but the epidemiological evidence for this is scarce. Soluble organic compounds appear to be implicated in PM-induced allergy and cancer, but the data from epidemiological studies are insufficient for any conclusions. The present review suggests that there may be a need for improvements in research designs. In particular, there is a need for better exposure assessments in epidemiological investigations, whereas experimental data would benefit from an improved comparability of studies. Combined experimental and epidemiological investigations may also help answer some of the unresolved issues.
确定与引发不良健康影响密切相关的环境颗粒物(PM)组分对于实施更具成本效益的减排策略以改善空气质量至关重要。本综述重点关注不同颗粒特性对PM诱导效应的重要性,以及流行病学和实验研究结果是否具有一致性。进行此类比较时一个明显的问题是,关于环境PM特定组分效应的流行病学和实验数据有限。尽管如此,仍可得出一些结论。关于PM粒径组分的重要性,实验和流行病学研究存在一定冲突,但粗颗粒组分(PM10 - 2.5)的效应似乎不容忽视,在这方面似乎存在一定的一致性。更好地表征暴露情况可能会提高实验和流行病学研究结果之间的一致性,特别是对于超细颗粒。实验数据表明表面积是一个重要指标,但成分在引发效应方面可能发挥更大作用。对于特定PM组分,流行病学和实验结果之间的一致性在金属方面最为令人信服,金属似乎对肺部和心血管疾病的发展都很重要。金属也可能参与PM诱导的过敏致敏,但这方面的流行病学证据很少。可溶性有机化合物似乎与PM诱导的过敏和癌症有关,但流行病学研究数据不足以得出任何结论。本综述表明可能需要改进研究设计。特别是,流行病学调查需要更好地评估暴露情况,而实验数据将受益于研究可比性的提高。结合实验和流行病学调查也可能有助于回答一些未解决的问题。