Gibb Susan, Hundley Vanora
School of Nursing and Midwifery, The Robert Gordon University, Garthdee, Aberdeen, AB10 7QG, UK.
Midwifery. 2007 Dec;23(4):413-24. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.07.005. Epub 2006 Dec 13.
to explore midwives' views of psychosocial well-being in the postnatal period.
qualitative study using focus-group interviews conducted in 1999.
two community health centres and a school of nursing and midwifery in Scotland.
a convenience sample of community and student midwives.
thematic analysis was undertaken through the identification of codes, categories and themes.
the categories were generated from the interview questions: 'the meaning midwives give to women's psychosocial well-being', 'midwives' assessment of women's well-being', and 'midwives views of worrying behaviours' displayed by women. From the first two categories, themes of 'coping', 'expectations', 'observation and communication skills', 'labour debriefing', and 'previous contact with women' emerged. Midwives assessed coping and unmet expectations through a range of communication and observational skills, including the use of a form of labour debriefing. Midwives who knew women during their pregnancy thought that they were able to assess coping and expectations better in the postnatal period. The midwives tended to describe women using stereotypical categories. From the third category, 'worrying behaviours', three themes emerged; 'extreme or obsessive behaviours about self, the baby or house' 'wanting to detain you' and 'quiet women'.
the meaning midwives give to psychosocial well-being includes a complex interplay between midwives' views of psychosocial well-being and their assessment of it. The importance midwives give to knowing women in pregnancy has implications for the ongoing debate about the provision of continuity of carer. Midwives used a range of techniques to elicit accurate information, to confirm problems or be reassured that all was well. Views based on stereotypical generalisations should be challenged.
探讨助产士对产后心理社会幸福感的看法。
1999年进行的焦点小组访谈定性研究。
苏格兰的两个社区健康中心以及一所护理与助产学校。
社区助产士和学生助产士的便利样本。
通过识别代码、类别和主题进行主题分析。
类别源自访谈问题:“助产士对女性心理社会幸福感的理解”、“助产士对女性幸福感的评估”以及女性表现出的“助产士对令人担忧行为的看法”。从前两个类别中,出现了“应对”、“期望”、“观察与沟通技巧”、“分娩情况汇报”以及“与女性的先前接触”等主题。助产士通过一系列沟通和观察技巧评估应对情况和未满足的期望,包括使用一种分娩情况汇报形式。在孕期认识女性的助产士认为,她们在产后能够更好地评估应对情况和期望。助产士倾向于用刻板的类别来描述女性。从第三个类别“令人担忧的行为”中,出现了三个主题:“对自身、婴儿或家庭的极端或强迫行为”、“想留住你”以及“安静的女性”。
助产士赋予心理社会幸福感的含义包括助产士对心理社会幸福感的看法与其评估之间的复杂相互作用。助产士重视在孕期认识女性,这对当前关于提供连续性护理的辩论具有影响。助产士使用一系列技巧来获取准确信息、确认问题或放心一切正常。基于刻板概括的观点应受到质疑。