Suppr超能文献

用于定义急性心肌梗死合并症的ICD-10编码算法。

ICD-10 coding algorithms for defining comorbidities of acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

So Lawrence, Evans Dewey, Quan Hude

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences and Centre for Health and Policy Studies, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Dec 15;6:161. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-161.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the introduction of ICD-10 throughout Canada, it is important to ensure that Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) comorbidities employed in risk adjustment methods remain valid and robust. Therefore, we developed ICD-10 coding algorithms for nine AMI comorbidities, examined the validity of the ICD-10 and ICD-9 coding algorithms in detection of these comorbidities, and assessed their performance in predicting mortality. The nine comorbidities that we examined were shock, diabetes with complications, congestive heart failure, cancer, cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary edema, acute renal failure, chronic renal failure, and cardiac dysrhythmias.

METHODS

Coders generated a comprehensive list of ICD-10 codes corresponding to each AMI comorbidity. Physicians independently reviewed and determined the clinical relevance of each item on the list. To ensure that the newly developed ICD-10 coding algorithms were valid in recording comorbidities, medical charts were reviewed. After assessing ICD-10 algorithms' validity, both ICD-10 and ICD-9 algorithms were applied to a Canadian provincial hospital discharge database to predict in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality.

RESULTS

Compared to chart review data as a 'criterion standard', ICD-9 and ICD-10 data had similar sensitivities (ranging from 7.1-100%), and specificities (above 93.6%) for each of the nine AMI comorbidities studied. The frequencies for the comorbidities were similar between ICD-9 and ICD-10 coding algorithms for 49,861 AMI patients in a Canadian province during 1994-2004. The C-statistics for predicting 30-day and 1 year mortality were the same for ICD-9 (0.82) and for ICD-10 data (0.81).

CONCLUSION

The ICD-10 coding algorithms developed in this study to define AMI comorbidities performed similarly as past ICD-9 coding algorithms in detecting conditions and risk-adjustment in our sample. However, the ICD-10 coding algorithms should be further validated in external databases.

摘要

背景

随着国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)在加拿大全面推行,确保风险调整方法中所采用的急性心肌梗死(AMI)合并症编码仍然有效且可靠至关重要。因此,我们开发了针对九种AMI合并症的ICD - 10编码算法,检验了ICD - 10和ICD - 9编码算法在检测这些合并症方面的有效性,并评估了它们在预测死亡率方面的表现。我们所研究的九种合并症为休克、伴有并发症的糖尿病、充血性心力衰竭、癌症、脑血管疾病、肺水肿、急性肾衰竭、慢性肾衰竭以及心律失常。

方法

编码人员生成了与每种AMI合并症相对应的ICD - 10编码综合列表。医生独立审查并确定列表上每个条目的临床相关性。为确保新开发的ICD - 10编码算法在记录合并症方面有效,对病历进行了审查。在评估ICD - 10算法的有效性之后,将ICD - 10和ICD - 9算法应用于加拿大一个省级医院出院数据库,以预测住院期间、30天和1年的死亡率。

结果

与作为“标准参照”的病历审查数据相比,ICD - 9和ICD - 10数据对于所研究的九种AMI合并症中的每一种都具有相似的敏感性(范围为7.1 - 100%)和特异性(高于93.6%)。在1994 - 2004年期间,加拿大一个省份的49,861例AMI患者中,ICD - 9和ICD - 10编码算法所统计的合并症发生频率相似。ICD - 9(0.82)和ICD - 10数据(0.81)在预测30天和1年死亡率方面的C统计量相同。

结论

本研究中开发的用于定义AMI合并症的ICD - 10编码算法,在我们的样本中检测病情和进行风险调整方面与过去的ICD - 9编码算法表现相似。然而,ICD - 10编码算法应在外部数据库中进一步验证。

相似文献

1
ICD-10 coding algorithms for defining comorbidities of acute myocardial infarction.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Dec 15;6:161. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-161.
2
ICD-10 adaptations of the Ontario acute myocardial infarction mortality prediction rules performed as well as the original versions.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;60(9):971-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.12.009. Epub 2007 May 8.
4
Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.
Med Care. 2005 Nov;43(11):1130-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83.
5
Stroke: the Elixhauser Index for comorbidity adjustment of in-hospital case fatality.
Neurology. 2008 Jul 22;71(4):283-7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000318278.41347.94.
7
Automated Assessment of Existing Patient's Revised Cardiac Risk Index Using Algorithmic Software.
Anesth Analg. 2019 May;128(5):909-916. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003440.
8
Validating ICD coding algorithms for diabetes mellitus from administrative data.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Aug;89(2):189-95. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.03.007. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
9
Validity of information on comorbidity derived rom ICD-9-CCM administrative data.
Med Care. 2002 Aug;40(8):675-85. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200208000-00007.

引用本文的文献

1
First-Line β-Blocker Use for Hypertension in the Veterans Health Administration.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2529026. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.29026.
2
Initiation of Pregabalin vs Gabapentin and Development of Heart Failure.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2524451. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.24451.
3
Center-Level Variation in the Development of Acute Kidney Injury Following Cardiac Operation.
CJC Open. 2025 Apr 6;7(6):759-767. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2025.04.003. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Understanding Transient Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Reduction During Atrial Fibrillation With Artificial Intelligence.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 20;14(10):e040641. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.040641. Epub 2025 May 13.
9
Trends in Initial Antihypertensive Medication Prescribing Among >2.8 Million Veterans Newly Diagnosed With Hypertension, 2000 to 2019.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Oct 15;13(20):e036557. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036557. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
10
Impact of the medical fitness model on long term health outcomes in older adults.
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Aug 20;24(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05208-6.

本文引用的文献

4
Mortality after acute myocardial infarction according to income and education.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Apr;60(4):351-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.200X.040972.
7
Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.
Med Care. 2005 Nov;43(11):1130-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83.
8
Measuring diagnoses: ICD code accuracy.
Health Serv Res. 2005 Oct;40(5 Pt 2):1620-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00444.x.
10
Data quality in an information-rich environment: Canada as an example.
Can J Aging. 2005 Spring;24 Suppl 1:153-70. doi: 10.1353/cja.2005.0055.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验