So Lawrence, Evans Dewey, Quan Hude
Department of Community Health Sciences and Centre for Health and Policy Studies, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Dec 15;6:161. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-161.
With the introduction of ICD-10 throughout Canada, it is important to ensure that Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) comorbidities employed in risk adjustment methods remain valid and robust. Therefore, we developed ICD-10 coding algorithms for nine AMI comorbidities, examined the validity of the ICD-10 and ICD-9 coding algorithms in detection of these comorbidities, and assessed their performance in predicting mortality. The nine comorbidities that we examined were shock, diabetes with complications, congestive heart failure, cancer, cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary edema, acute renal failure, chronic renal failure, and cardiac dysrhythmias.
Coders generated a comprehensive list of ICD-10 codes corresponding to each AMI comorbidity. Physicians independently reviewed and determined the clinical relevance of each item on the list. To ensure that the newly developed ICD-10 coding algorithms were valid in recording comorbidities, medical charts were reviewed. After assessing ICD-10 algorithms' validity, both ICD-10 and ICD-9 algorithms were applied to a Canadian provincial hospital discharge database to predict in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality.
Compared to chart review data as a 'criterion standard', ICD-9 and ICD-10 data had similar sensitivities (ranging from 7.1-100%), and specificities (above 93.6%) for each of the nine AMI comorbidities studied. The frequencies for the comorbidities were similar between ICD-9 and ICD-10 coding algorithms for 49,861 AMI patients in a Canadian province during 1994-2004. The C-statistics for predicting 30-day and 1 year mortality were the same for ICD-9 (0.82) and for ICD-10 data (0.81).
The ICD-10 coding algorithms developed in this study to define AMI comorbidities performed similarly as past ICD-9 coding algorithms in detecting conditions and risk-adjustment in our sample. However, the ICD-10 coding algorithms should be further validated in external databases.
随着国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)在加拿大全面推行,确保风险调整方法中所采用的急性心肌梗死(AMI)合并症编码仍然有效且可靠至关重要。因此,我们开发了针对九种AMI合并症的ICD - 10编码算法,检验了ICD - 10和ICD - 9编码算法在检测这些合并症方面的有效性,并评估了它们在预测死亡率方面的表现。我们所研究的九种合并症为休克、伴有并发症的糖尿病、充血性心力衰竭、癌症、脑血管疾病、肺水肿、急性肾衰竭、慢性肾衰竭以及心律失常。
编码人员生成了与每种AMI合并症相对应的ICD - 10编码综合列表。医生独立审查并确定列表上每个条目的临床相关性。为确保新开发的ICD - 10编码算法在记录合并症方面有效,对病历进行了审查。在评估ICD - 10算法的有效性之后,将ICD - 10和ICD - 9算法应用于加拿大一个省级医院出院数据库,以预测住院期间、30天和1年的死亡率。
与作为“标准参照”的病历审查数据相比,ICD - 9和ICD - 10数据对于所研究的九种AMI合并症中的每一种都具有相似的敏感性(范围为7.1 - 100%)和特异性(高于93.6%)。在1994 - 2004年期间,加拿大一个省份的49,861例AMI患者中,ICD - 9和ICD - 10编码算法所统计的合并症发生频率相似。ICD - 9(0.82)和ICD - 10数据(0.81)在预测30天和1年死亡率方面的C统计量相同。
本研究中开发的用于定义AMI合并症的ICD - 10编码算法,在我们的样本中检测病情和进行风险调整方面与过去的ICD - 9编码算法表现相似。然而,ICD - 10编码算法应在外部数据库中进一步验证。