Suppr超能文献

社区与门诊药房:医疗保险D部分实施前患者护理服务及计费模式评估

Community and ambulatory pharmacy: evaluation of patient care services and billing patterns before implementation of Medicare part D.

作者信息

Beatty Stuart J, Rodis Jennifer L, Bellebaum Katherine L, Mehta Bella H

机构信息

Division of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.

出版信息

J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2006 Nov-Dec;46(6):707-14. doi: 10.1331/1544-3191.46.6.707.beatty.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide a summary of community and ambulatory pharmacy practice and billing patterns for medication therapy management services before implementation of Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

Ambulatory care and community pharmacy practice settings in the United States in January 2004.

PARTICIPANTS

Members of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Ambulatory Practice and Research Network, preceptors of the American Pharmacists Association (APhA) Community Pharmacy Residency Programs, and participants in the APhA Immunizing Pharmacist listserv.

INTERVENTIONS

E-mail invitations to participate in a Web-based survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Practice setting; pharmacy services performed; whether pharmacists were billing for pharmacy services; if billing, the billing technique used; if not billing, the reason for not billing.

RESULTS

Of 349 respondents, 127 (36.4%) were practicing within a physician office, while 121 (34.7%) were practicing in community pharmacies. Diabetes, anticoagulation, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and smoking cessation management services were performed significantly more often in physician offices. Immunization delivery and diabetes, dyslipidemia, and osteoporosis screenings were performed significantly more often in community settings. A total of 190 (54.5%) pharmacists stated that they were billing for pharmacy services. More community pharmacists were billing for services compared with other combined practice settings (69.2% versus 46.7%, P < .001). Top reasons identified for not billing for services were salaried position, indigent population, and discomfort with the billing process.

CONCLUSION

Valuable baseline data are provided regarding pharmacy services that have been successfully implemented in ambulatory and community practice settings and which billing techniques were used to receive reimbursement before the implementation of MMA.

摘要

目的

总结2003年《医疗保险处方药改进和现代化法案》(MMA)实施之前,社区药房和门诊药房的药物治疗管理服务实践及计费模式。

设计

横断面调查。

地点

2004年1月美国的门诊护理和社区药房实践场所。

参与者

美国临床药师学院门诊实践与研究网络成员、美国药剂师协会(APhA)社区药房住院医师培训项目的带教老师,以及APhA免疫药剂师邮件列表服务的参与者。

干预措施

通过电子邮件邀请参与基于网络的调查。

主要观察指标

实践场所;提供的药房服务;药剂师是否为药房服务计费;若计费,所采用的计费技术;若未计费,未计费的原因。

结果

在349名受访者中,127名(36.4%)在医师办公室工作,而121名(34.7%)在社区药房工作。糖尿病、抗凝、血脂异常、高血压和戒烟管理服务在医师办公室开展得更为频繁。免疫接种以及糖尿病、血脂异常和骨质疏松症筛查在社区场所开展得更为频繁。共有190名(54.5%)药剂师表示他们为药房服务计费。与其他综合实践场所相比,更多的社区药剂师为服务计费(69.2%对46.7%,P <.001)。未计费服务的主要原因是受薪职位、贫困人群以及对计费流程不适应。

结论

提供了关于在门诊和社区实践场所已成功实施的药房服务以及在MMA实施之前用于获得报销的计费技术的宝贵基线数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验