Bembenek A, Fischer J, Albrecht H, Kemnitz E, Gretschel S, Schneider U, Dresel S, Schlag P M
Department of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Robert-Rössle-Klinik at the "HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch", University Medicine Berlin, Charité Campus Buch, Lindenbergerweg 80, Berlin, 13125, Germany.
World J Surg. 2007 Feb;31(2):267-75. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0720-7.
The evidence on which to base guidelines for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer is still limited. In order to facilitate the further implementation of renewed guidelines, we evaluated patient- and disease-specific factors for their impact on the results of SLNB.
Prospective data acquisition from patients undergoing surgery for primary invasive breast cancer was performed. All patients underwent SLNB using the radiocolloid or the combined technique. The association of patient- and disease-specific factors to detection rate and false-negative rate was calculated using univariate and multivariate analyses (P < 0.05 considered as significant). Calculation of the false-negative rate was based on patients who underwent a backup axillary dissection.
Among 455 consecutively enrolled patients, a significant inverse association to the detection rate was found for extracapsular extension of non-SLN metastases, body mass index (BMI), number of involved lymph nodes, pT category, tumor size, and age. A significant association to the false-negative rate to identify macrometastases was found for pT category, tumor size, and grading. Other factors, such as prior surgery, multicentric tumor growth, or vascular invasion, showed no influence. A cut-point analysis revealed that a tumor size of 2 cm separated the collective of patients with the highest significance in regard to the false-negative rate (9% vs. 25%).
Our results indicate that SLNB can be safely used in elderly and obese patients with multicentric tumors and those having undergone prior surgery for benign breast disease. However, the method should be applied with caution in patients with tumors larger than 2 cm.
乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)指南所依据的证据仍然有限。为了促进更新后的指南的进一步实施,我们评估了患者和疾病特异性因素对SLNB结果的影响。
对接受原发性浸润性乳腺癌手术的患者进行前瞻性数据采集。所有患者均采用放射性胶体或联合技术进行SLNB。使用单因素和多因素分析计算患者和疾病特异性因素与检出率和假阴性率的相关性(P < 0.05认为具有显著性)。假阴性率的计算基于接受备用腋窝淋巴结清扫术的患者。
在连续纳入的455例患者中,发现非前哨淋巴结转移的包膜外扩展、体重指数(BMI)、受累淋巴结数量、pT分期、肿瘤大小和年龄与检出率呈显著负相关。发现pT分期、肿瘤大小和分级与识别大转移灶的假阴性率显著相关。其他因素,如既往手术、多中心肿瘤生长或血管侵犯,未显示出影响。切点分析显示,肿瘤大小2 cm将假阴性率方面具有最高显著性的患者群体区分开来(9%对25%)。
我们的结果表明,SLNB可安全用于患有多中心肿瘤的老年和肥胖患者以及既往因良性乳腺疾病接受过手术的患者。然而,对于肿瘤大于2 cm的患者,应谨慎应用该方法。