Ishii Cintia, Arashiro Priscila Midori, Desgualdo Liliane
Departamento de Fonoaudiologia da Universidade Federal de São Paulo.
Pro Fono. 2006 Sep-Dec;18(3):285-92. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872006000300008.
temporal ordering and temporal resolution.
to compare the performance of professional singers with that of well tuned and out of tune amateur singers in the pitch pattern test (PPT) and in the Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT).
participants were 78 individuals, male and female, with ages ranging from 18 to 55 years. All of the participants were singers with normal hearing - previously assessed using pure tone and speech audiometry--and had no language, speech, voice or hearing complaints. Each individual answered a questionnaire concerning, among other subjects, perception about own voice when singing, number of years of professional singing, difficulties when singing new songs and number of years of music study. For the objective assessment the PPT and the RGDT were used in order to investigate temporal ordering and temporal resolution respectively.
regarding the RGDT, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups and variables. As for the PPT, it was observed that professional singers presented a better performance, with statistic significance, when compared to well tuned amateur singers and these a better performance when compared to out of tune amateur singers. The performance in the PPT was related to specialized training and study of music theory.
the RGDT did not prove to be a sensitive test to distinguish professional and amateur singers. On the other hand, the PPT did. The performance in the PPT reflects the number of years of specialized auditory training and music theory study.
时间顺序和时间分辨率。
在音高模式测试(PPT)和随机间隙检测测试(RGDT)中比较专业歌手与音准良好和音准不佳的业余歌手的表现。
参与者为78名年龄在18至55岁之间的男女个体。所有参与者均为听力正常的歌手——之前已通过纯音和言语听力测试进行评估——且无语言、言语、嗓音或听力方面的问题。每个人都回答了一份问卷,内容包括唱歌时对自己声音的感知、专业演唱的年限、演唱新歌时的困难以及音乐学习的年限等。为了进行客观评估,分别使用PPT和RGDT来研究时间顺序和时间分辨率。
关于RGDT,各组和各变量之间没有统计学上的显著差异。至于PPT,观察到与音准良好的业余歌手相比,专业歌手表现更好,具有统计学意义;与音准不佳的业余歌手相比,音准良好的业余歌手表现更好。PPT中的表现与专业训练和音乐理论学习有关。
RGDT并未被证明是区分专业歌手和业余歌手的敏感测试。另一方面,PPT是。PPT中的表现反映了专业听觉训练和音乐理论学习的年限。