• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[职业歌手以及音准良好和音准不佳的业余歌手的排序与时间分辨率]

[Ordering and temporal resolution in professional singers and in well tuned and out of tune amateur singers].

作者信息

Ishii Cintia, Arashiro Priscila Midori, Desgualdo Liliane

机构信息

Departamento de Fonoaudiologia da Universidade Federal de São Paulo.

出版信息

Pro Fono. 2006 Sep-Dec;18(3):285-92. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872006000300008.

DOI:10.1590/s0104-56872006000300008
PMID:17180797
Abstract

BACKGROUND

temporal ordering and temporal resolution.

AIM

to compare the performance of professional singers with that of well tuned and out of tune amateur singers in the pitch pattern test (PPT) and in the Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT).

METHOD

participants were 78 individuals, male and female, with ages ranging from 18 to 55 years. All of the participants were singers with normal hearing - previously assessed using pure tone and speech audiometry--and had no language, speech, voice or hearing complaints. Each individual answered a questionnaire concerning, among other subjects, perception about own voice when singing, number of years of professional singing, difficulties when singing new songs and number of years of music study. For the objective assessment the PPT and the RGDT were used in order to investigate temporal ordering and temporal resolution respectively.

RESULTS

regarding the RGDT, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups and variables. As for the PPT, it was observed that professional singers presented a better performance, with statistic significance, when compared to well tuned amateur singers and these a better performance when compared to out of tune amateur singers. The performance in the PPT was related to specialized training and study of music theory.

CONCLUSION

the RGDT did not prove to be a sensitive test to distinguish professional and amateur singers. On the other hand, the PPT did. The performance in the PPT reflects the number of years of specialized auditory training and music theory study.

摘要

背景

时间顺序和时间分辨率。

目的

在音高模式测试(PPT)和随机间隙检测测试(RGDT)中比较专业歌手与音准良好和音准不佳的业余歌手的表现。

方法

参与者为78名年龄在18至55岁之间的男女个体。所有参与者均为听力正常的歌手——之前已通过纯音和言语听力测试进行评估——且无语言、言语、嗓音或听力方面的问题。每个人都回答了一份问卷,内容包括唱歌时对自己声音的感知、专业演唱的年限、演唱新歌时的困难以及音乐学习的年限等。为了进行客观评估,分别使用PPT和RGDT来研究时间顺序和时间分辨率。

结果

关于RGDT,各组和各变量之间没有统计学上的显著差异。至于PPT,观察到与音准良好的业余歌手相比,专业歌手表现更好,具有统计学意义;与音准不佳的业余歌手相比,音准良好的业余歌手表现更好。PPT中的表现与专业训练和音乐理论学习有关。

结论

RGDT并未被证明是区分专业歌手和业余歌手的敏感测试。另一方面,PPT是。PPT中的表现反映了专业听觉训练和音乐理论学习的年限。

相似文献

1
[Ordering and temporal resolution in professional singers and in well tuned and out of tune amateur singers].[职业歌手以及音准良好和音准不佳的业余歌手的排序与时间分辨率]
Pro Fono. 2006 Sep-Dec;18(3):285-92. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872006000300008.
2
[Performance of normal young adults in two temporal resolution tests].[正常年轻成年人在两项时间分辨率测试中的表现]
Pro Fono. 2008 Jan-Mar;20(1):19-24. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872008000100004.
3
Assessment of temporal aspects in popular singers.流行歌手的时间维度评估。
Codas. 2015 Nov-Dec;27(6):520-5. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20152014234.
4
Singing proficiency in the general population.普通人群的歌唱水平。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Feb;121(2):1182-9. doi: 10.1121/1.2427111.
5
Effect of Training and Level of External Auditory Feedback on the Singing Voice: Volume and Quality.训练及外耳道反馈水平对歌唱嗓音的影响:音量与音质
J Voice. 2016 Jul;30(4):434-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
6
Amateur Music Theatre Singers' Perceptions of their Current Singing Voice Function.业余音乐剧演唱者对其当前歌唱嗓音功能的认知。
J Voice. 2021 Jul;35(4):589-596. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.12.009. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
7
Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.一组纯音听力阈值正常的职业歌手的瞬态诱发耳声发射。
Ear Hear. 2008 Jun;29(3):360-77. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816a0d1e.
8
Random Gap Detection Test and Random Gap Detection Test-Expanded results in children with auditory neuropathy.听觉神经病患儿的随机间隙检测试验和随机间隙检测试验-扩展结果
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Nov;73(11):1558-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.07.024. Epub 2009 Sep 6.
9
Voice Quality and Auditory Processing in Subjects with and Without Musical Experience.有音乐经验和无音乐经验受试者的语音质量与听觉处理
J Voice. 2021 Jan;35(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
10
Auditory temporal resolution threshold in elderly individuals.老年人的听觉时间分辨阈值。
Pro Fono. 2010 Jul-Sep;22(3):351-7. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872010000300032.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Monaural Stimulation on Frequency-Following Responses in Adults Who Can Sing in Tune and Those Who Cannot.单耳刺激对能唱准音和不能唱准音的成年人频率跟随反应的影响。
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Feb 8;27(2):e203-e210. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761167. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Choir Singing Practice and Temporal Ordering in the Elderly.老年人的合唱练习与时间排序
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Aug 13;26(2):e199-e207. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1733930. eCollection 2022 Apr.
3
Pitch-Matching Accuracy and Temporal Auditory Processing.
音高匹配准确性与听觉时间加工
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Apr;22(2):113-118. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1603763. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
4
Short-Term Musical Training and Pyschoacoustical Abilities.短期音乐训练与心理声学能力
Audiol Res. 2014 Nov 19;4(1):102. doi: 10.4081/audiores.2014.102. eCollection 2014 Mar 6.
5
Applicability of the P300 frequency pattern test to assess auditory processing.P300 频率模式测试在评估听觉处理中的适用性。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Aug;79(4):512-21. doi: 10.5935/1808-8694.20130091.