Suppr超能文献

塞来昔布与非选择性非甾体抗炎药加质子泵抑制剂:需要考虑哪些因素?

Celecoxib versus a non-selective NSAID plus proton-pump inhibitor: what are the considerations?

作者信息

Chen Judy T, Pucino Frank, Resman-Targoff Beth H

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University School of Pharmacy and Phamaceutical Sciences, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2091, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2006;20(4):11-32.

Abstract

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are extensively used worldwide. However, associated adverse gastrointestinal effects (NSAID gastropathy) such as bleeding, perforation and obstruction result in considerable morbidity, mortality, and expense. Although it is essential to employ gastroprotective strategies to minimize these complications in patients at risk, controversy remains on whether celecoxib alone or a non-selective NSAID in conjunction with a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) is a superior choice. Recent concerns regarding potential cardiovascular toxicities associated with cox-2 selective inhibitors may favor non-selective NSAID/PPI co-therapy as the preferred choice. Concomitant use of low-dose aspirin with any NSAID increases the risk of gastrointestinal complications and diminishes the improved gastrointestinal safety profile of celecoxib; whereas use of ibuprofen plus PPI regimens may negate aspirin's antiplatelet benefits. Evidence shows that concurrent use of a non-selective NSAID (such as naproxen) plus a PPI is as effective in preventing NSAID gastropathy as celecoxib, and may be more cost-effective. Patients failing or intolerant to this therapy would be candidates for celecoxib at the lowest effective dose for the shortest duration of time. Potential benefits from using low-dose celecoxib with a PPI in patients previously experiencing bleeding ulcers while taking NSAIDs remains to be proven. An evidence-based debate is presented to assist clinicians with the difficult decision-making process of preventing NSAID gastropathy while minimizing other complications.

摘要

非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)在全球范围内被广泛使用。然而,与之相关的不良胃肠道效应(NSAID 胃病),如出血、穿孔和梗阻,会导致相当高的发病率、死亡率和费用。尽管采用胃保护策略以将这些并发症在高危患者中降至最低至关重要,但对于单独使用塞来昔布还是非选择性 NSAID 联合质子泵抑制剂(PPI)哪个是更好的选择仍存在争议。近期对 COX-2 选择性抑制剂潜在心血管毒性的担忧可能使非选择性 NSAID/PPI 联合治疗成为首选。低剂量阿司匹林与任何 NSAID 同时使用会增加胃肠道并发症的风险,并削弱塞来昔布改善的胃肠道安全性;而布洛芬加 PPI 方案可能会抵消阿司匹林的抗血小板益处。有证据表明,非选择性 NSAID(如萘普生)加 PPI 联合使用在预防 NSAID 胃病方面与塞来昔布一样有效,并且可能更具成本效益。对这种治疗无效或不耐受的患者将是在最短时间内使用最低有效剂量塞来昔布的候选者。在先前服用 NSAIDs 时出现出血性溃疡的患者中,联合使用低剂量塞来昔布和 PPI 的潜在益处仍有待证实。本文进行了基于证据的讨论,以帮助临床医生在预防 NSAID 胃病同时将其他并发症降至最低这一艰难的决策过程中提供帮助。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验