Lai Kam-Chuen, Chu Kent-Man, Hui Wai-Mo, Wong Benjamin Chun-Yu, Hu Wayne Hsing-Ching, Wong Wai-Man, Chan Annie On-On, Wong John, Lam Shiu-Kum
Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Am J Med. 2005 Nov;118(11):1271-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.04.031.
Selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors cause significantly fewer peptic ulcers than conventional nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients at low risk or high risk for peptic ulcers. On the other hand, proton pump inhibitor co-therapy has also been shown to be effective in preventing relapse of peptic ulcers in high-risk patients using nonselective NSAIDs. We compared the efficacy of a selective COX-2 inhibitor with that of proton pump inhibitor co-therapy in the reduction in the incidence of ulcer relapse in patients with a history of NSAID-related peptic ulcers.
For this study, we recruited 224 patients who developed ulcer complications after NSAID use. We excluded patients who required concomitant aspirin treatment and who had renal impairment. After healing of ulcers and eradication of Helicobacter pylori, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with celecoxib 200 mg daily (n = 120) or naproxen 750 mg daily and lansoprazole 30 mg daily (n = 122) for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was recurrent ulcer complications.
During a median follow-up of 24 weeks, 4 (3.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.0%-7.3%) patients in the celecoxib group, compared with 7 patients (6.3%, 95% CI 1.6%-11.1%) in the lansoprazole group, developed recurrent ulcer complications (absolute difference -2.6%; 95% CI for the difference -9.1%-3.7%). Celecoxib was statistically non-inferior to lansoprazole co-therapy in the prevention of recurrent ulcer complications. Concomitant illness (hazard ratio 4.72, 95% CI 1.24-18.18) and age 65 years or more (hazard ratio 18.52, 95% CI 2.26-142.86) were independent risk factors for ulcer recurrences. Significantly more patients receiving celecoxib (15.0%, 95% CI 9.7-22.5) developed dyspepsia than patients receiving lansoprazole (5.7%, 95% CI 2.8-11.4. P = .02).
Celecoxib was as effective as lansoprazole co-therapy in the prevention of recurrences of ulcer complications in subjects with a history of NSAID-related complicated peptic ulcers. However, celecoxib, similar to lansoprazole co-therapy, was still associated with a significant proportion of ulcer complication recurrences. In addition, more patients receiving celecoxib developed dyspepsia than patients receiving lansoprazole and naproxen.
在患消化性溃疡低风险或高风险的患者中,选择性环氧化酶 - 2(COX - 2)抑制剂所致消化性溃疡显著少于传统非选择性非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)。另一方面,质子泵抑制剂联合疗法在预防使用非选择性NSAIDs的高风险患者消化性溃疡复发方面也已显示出有效性。我们比较了选择性COX - 2抑制剂与质子泵抑制剂联合疗法在降低NSAIDs相关消化性溃疡病史患者溃疡复发率方面的疗效。
在本研究中,我们招募了224例在使用NSAIDs后发生溃疡并发症的患者。我们排除了需要同时使用阿司匹林治疗以及有肾功能损害的患者。在溃疡愈合和幽门螺杆菌根除后,患者被随机分配接受每日200毫克塞来昔布治疗(n = 120)或每日750毫克萘普生和每日30毫克兰索拉唑治疗(n = 122),为期24周。主要终点是复发性溃疡并发症。
在中位随访24周期间,塞来昔布组有4例患者(3.7%,95%置信区间[CI] 0.0% - 7.3%)发生复发性溃疡并发症,而兰索拉唑组有7例患者(6.3%,95% CI 1.6% - 11.1%)发生复发性溃疡并发症(绝对差异 -2.6%;差异的95% CI -9.1% - 3.7%)。在预防复发性溃疡并发症方面,塞来昔布在统计学上不劣于兰索拉唑联合疗法。合并疾病(风险比4.72,95% CI 1.24 - 18.18)和65岁及以上年龄(风险比18.52,95% CI 2.26 - 142.86)是溃疡复发的独立危险因素。接受塞来昔布治疗的患者发生消化不良的比例(15.0%,95% CI 9.7 - 22.5)显著高于接受兰索拉唑治疗的患者(5.7%,95% CI 2.8 - 11.4。P = 0.02)。
在有NSAIDs相关复杂性消化性溃疡病史的受试者中,塞来昔布在预防溃疡并发症复发方面与兰索拉唑联合疗法效果相当。然而,与兰索拉唑联合疗法类似,塞来昔布仍与相当比例的溃疡并发症复发相关。此外,接受塞来昔布治疗的患者发生消化不良的人数多于接受兰索拉唑和萘普生治疗的患者。