Suppr超能文献

基于统计等效性检验方法,对选定的感兴趣的混合物组进行可加性检验。

Testing for additivity at select mixture groups of interest based on statistical equivalence testing methods.

作者信息

Stork Leanna G, Gennings Chris, Carchman Richard A, Carter Walter H, Pounds Joel, Mumtaz Moiz

机构信息

Monsanto Company, St. Louis, MO 63167, USA.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2006 Dec;26(6):1601-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00846.x.

Abstract

Several assumptions, defined and undefined, are used in the toxicity assessment of chemical mixtures. In scientific practice mixture components in the low-dose region, particularly subthreshold doses, are often assumed to behave additively (i.e., zero interaction) based on heuristic arguments. This assumption has important implications in the practice of risk assessment, but has not been experimentally tested. We have developed methodology to test for additivity in the sense of Berenbaum (Advances in Cancer Research, 1981), based on the statistical equivalence testing literature where the null hypothesis of interaction is rejected for the alternative hypothesis of additivity when data support the claim. The implication of this approach is that conclusions of additivity are made with a false positive rate controlled by the experimenter. The claim of additivity is based on prespecified additivity margins, which are chosen using expert biological judgment such that small deviations from additivity, which are not considered to be biologically important, are not statistically significant. This approach is in contrast to the usual hypothesis-testing framework that assumes additivity in the null hypothesis and rejects when there is significant evidence of interaction. In this scenario, failure to reject may be due to lack of statistical power making the claim of additivity problematic. The proposed method is illustrated in a mixture of five organophosphorus pesticides that were experimentally evaluated alone and at relevant mixing ratios. Motor activity was assessed in adult male rats following acute exposure. Four low-dose mixture groups were evaluated. Evidence of additivity is found in three of the four low-dose mixture groups. The proposed method tests for additivity of the whole mixture and does not take into account subset interactions (e.g., synergistic, antagonistic) that may have occurred and cancelled each other out.

摘要

在化学混合物的毒性评估中,使用了几个已定义和未定义的假设。在科学实践中,基于启发式论证,低剂量区域(特别是亚阈值剂量)的混合物成分通常被假定为具有相加作用(即零相互作用)。这一假设在风险评估实践中具有重要意义,但尚未经过实验验证。我们基于统计等效性检验文献,开发了一种方法来检验贝伦鲍姆意义上的相加性(《癌症研究进展》,1981年),即在数据支持该主张时,将相互作用的零假设拒绝,以支持相加性的备择假设。这种方法的含义是,相加性的结论是在实验者控制的假阳性率下得出的。相加性的主张基于预先设定的相加性界限,这些界限是通过专家生物学判断选择的,这样与相加性的小偏差(不被认为具有生物学重要性)在统计学上就不显著。这种方法与通常的假设检验框架形成对比,后者在零假设中假定相加性,并在有显著相互作用证据时拒绝。在这种情况下,未能拒绝可能是由于缺乏统计效力,使得相加性的主张存在问题。在所提出的方法中,对五种有机磷农药的混合物进行了说明,这些农药分别进行了实验评估,并以相关混合比例进行了测试。在成年雄性大鼠急性暴露后评估其运动活性。评估了四个低剂量混合物组。在四个低剂量混合物组中的三个组中发现了相加性的证据。所提出的方法检验的是整个混合物的相加性,没有考虑可能已经发生并相互抵消的子集相互作用(例如协同、拮抗)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验