Suppr超能文献

快速识别严重细菌感染低风险的发热新生儿:一项观察性研究。

Quick identification of febrile neonates with low risk for serious bacterial infection: an observational study.

作者信息

Marom R, Sakran W, Antonelli J, Horovitz Y, Zarfin Y, Koren A, Miron D

机构信息

Rappaport School of Medicine, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 Jan;92(1):F15-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.087981.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the possible usefulness of simple and quick criteria for identifying febrile neonates with low risk for serious bacterial infection (SBI).

DESIGN

All febrile neonates who were admitted between August 1998 and August 2003 to the Pediatric Emergency Department, HaEmek Medical Center, Afula, Israel, and to the Poriya Hospital, Tiberias, Israel, were included in the study. The recommended evaluation of each neonate included details of medical history and a complete physical examination, including blood culture, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), white cell count (WBC), and analysis and culture of urine and cerebrospinal fluid. Other tests were carried out as necessary. Patients who met all the following criteria were considered to have low risk for SBI: (1) unremarkable medical history; (2) good appearance; (3) no focal physical signs of infection; (4) ESR <30 mm at the end of the first hour; (5) WBC 5000-15 000/mm(3); (6) a normal urine analysis by the dipstick method.

RESULTS

Complete data were available for 386 neonates. SBI was documented in 108 (28%) neonates, of whom 14% had a urinary tract infection, 9.3% had acute otitis media, 2.3% had pneumonia, 1.3% had cellulitis, 0.5% had bacterial meningitis and 0.5% had bacterial gastroenteritis. The overall incidence of SBI was 1 in 166 (0.6%) neonates who fulfilled the criteria compared with 107 in 220 (48.6%) in the neonates who did not fulfil the criteria (p<0.001). The negative predictive value for SBI of the combination of the low-risk criteria was 99.4% (95% confidence interval 99.35% to 99.45%).

CONCLUSIONS

Fulfillment of the criteria for low risk might be a reliable and useful tool for excluding SBI in febrile neonates.

摘要

目的

探讨用于识别严重细菌感染(SBI)低风险发热新生儿的简单快速标准的可能实用性。

设计

纳入1998年8月至2003年8月间入住以色列阿富拉海梅克医疗中心儿科急诊科以及以色列提比里亚斯波里亚医院的所有发热新生儿。对每名新生儿的推荐评估包括病史细节及全面体格检查,包括血培养、红细胞沉降率(ESR)、白细胞计数(WBC)以及尿液和脑脊液分析及培养。必要时进行其他检查。符合以下所有标准的患者被认为SBI风险低:(1)病史无异常;(2)外观良好;(3)无感染的局灶性体征;(4)第一小时末ESR<30mm;(5)WBC 5000 - 15000/mm³;(6)试条法尿液分析正常。

结果

386例新生儿有完整数据。108例(28%)新生儿记录有SBI,其中14%患有尿路感染,9.3%患有急性中耳炎,2.3%患有肺炎,1.3%患有蜂窝织炎,0.5%患有细菌性脑膜炎,0.5%患有细菌性胃肠炎。符合标准的新生儿中SBI总体发生率为166例中的1例(0.6%),而不符合标准的220例新生儿中有107例(48.6%)(p<0.001)。低风险标准组合对SBI的阴性预测值为99.4%(95%置信区间99.35%至99.45%)。

结论

满足低风险标准可能是排除发热新生儿SBI的可靠且有用工具。

相似文献

1
Quick identification of febrile neonates with low risk for serious bacterial infection: an observational study.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 Jan;92(1):F15-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.087981.
3
Neonatal fever: utility of the Rochester criteria in determining low risk for serious bacterial infections.
Am J Emerg Med. 1997 May;15(3):299-302. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(97)90020-6.
5
Applying outpatient protocols in febrile infants 1-28 days of age: can the threshold be lowered?
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2000 Feb;39(2):81-8. doi: 10.1177/000992280003900202.
6
Predictive model for serious bacterial infections among infants younger than 3 months of age.
Pediatrics. 2001 Aug;108(2):311-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.2.311.
7
Identification of febrile neonates unlikely to have bacterial infections.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997 Jan;16(1):59-63. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199701000-00013.
8
A week-by-week analysis of the low-risk criteria for serious bacterial infection in febrile neonates.
Arch Dis Child. 2009 Apr;94(4):287-92. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.138768. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
9
A search for the 'Holy Grail' in the evaluation of febrile neonates aged 28 days or less: a prospective study.
Scand J Infect Dis. 2011 Apr;43(4):264-8. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2010.544670. Epub 2010 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

2
Cost Analysis of Emergency Department Criteria for Evaluation of Febrile Infants Ages 29 to 90 Days.
J Pediatr. 2021 Apr;231:94-101.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.10.033. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
3
Variability in Hospital Admission Rates for Neonates With Fever in North Carolina.
Glob Pediatr Health. 2019 Jul 25;6:2333794X19865447. doi: 10.1177/2333794X19865447. eCollection 2019.
5
Is there a place for "drive thru" management of neonatal fever? Not yet!
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 Jan;92(1):F2-3. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.100560.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical policy for children younger than three years presenting to the emergency department with fever.
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Oct;42(4):530-45. doi: 10.1067/s0196-0644(03)00628-0.
2
Acute otitis media in infants younger than two months of age: microbiology, clinical presentation and therapeutic approach.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002 Jul;21(7):669-74. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200207000-00013.
3
Community-acquired pneumonia in children.
N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 7;346(6):429-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra011994.
5
Applying outpatient protocols in febrile infants 1-28 days of age: can the threshold be lowered?
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2000 Feb;39(2):81-8. doi: 10.1177/000992280003900202.
6
Screening tests for urinary tract infection in children: A meta-analysis.
Pediatrics. 1999 Nov;104(5):e54. doi: 10.1542/peds.104.5.e54.
7
Unpredictability of serious bacterial illness in febrile infants from birth to 1 month of age.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 May;153(5):508-11. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.153.5.508.
8
Application of the Rochester Criteria in febrile neonates.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998 Mar;17(3):267-9. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199803000-00030.
9
Blood cultures in the evaluation of children with cellulitis.
Pediatrics. 1998 Mar;101(3):E4. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.3.e4.
10
Identification of febrile neonates unlikely to have bacterial infections.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997 Jan;16(1):59-63. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199701000-00013.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验