Suppr超能文献

28日龄及以内发热新生儿评估中的“圣杯”探寻:一项前瞻性研究

A search for the 'Holy Grail' in the evaluation of febrile neonates aged 28 days or less: a prospective study.

作者信息

Bilavsky Efraim, Ashkenazi-Hoffnung Liat, Yarden-Bilavsky Havatzelet, Amir Jacob, Livni Gilat

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics C, Schneider Children's Medical Center, Petah Tiqva, Israel.

出版信息

Scand J Infect Dis. 2011 Apr;43(4):264-8. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2010.544670. Epub 2010 Dec 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the reliability of low-risk criteria to exclude serious bacterial infection (SBI) in febrile neonates aged ≤28 days.

METHODS

All febrile neonates who were hospitalized for fever evaluation were prospectively divided into 2 groups by risk status for SBI. The following criteria were used to define low risk: (1) unremarkable medical history; (2) well-appearing; (3) no focal signs of infection; (4) white blood cell count between 5000 and 15,000/mm(3); (5) normal urinalysis; (6) no mucoid or bloody diarrhoea.

RESULTS

Of the 465 enrolled neonates, 177 (38.1%) were considered high risk for SBI and 288 (61.9%) low risk. SBIs were found in 55 (31.1%) neonates in the high-risk group compared to 10 (3.5%) in the low-risk group (p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the criteria for all types of SBI were 84.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 73.9-91.4%), 69.5% (95% CI 64.8-73.8%), 31% (95% CI 27.3-35.1%) and 96.5% (95% CI 94.3-98%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The defined criteria are not sufficiently reliable to exclude an SBI or an invasive SBI. We therefore suggest that all febrile neonates in this age group should be hospitalized for complete evaluation and consideration of empirical intravenous antibiotic treatment.

摘要

目的

确定低风险标准在排除≤28日龄发热新生儿严重细菌感染(SBI)方面的可靠性。

方法

所有因发热评估住院的发热新生儿根据SBI风险状态前瞻性地分为2组。采用以下标准定义低风险:(1)病史无异常;(2)外观良好;(3)无感染的局灶性体征;(4)白细胞计数在5000至15,000/mm³之间;(5)尿常规正常;(6)无黏液样或血性腹泻。

结果

在465例纳入的新生儿中,177例(38.1%)被认为SBI高风险,288例(61.9%)为低风险。高风险组55例(31.1%)新生儿发现有SBI,而低风险组为10例(3.5%)(p<0.001)。所有类型SBI标准的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为84.6%(95%置信区间(CI)73.9 - 91.4%)、69.5%(95%CI 64.8 - 73.8%)、31%(95%CI 27.3 - 35.1%)和96.5%(95%CI 94.3 - 98%)。

结论

所定义的标准在排除SBI或侵袭性SBI方面可靠性不足。因此,我们建议该年龄组的所有发热新生儿均应住院进行全面评估并考虑经验性静脉应用抗生素治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验