Young John L
Whiting Forensic Division, Connecticut Valley Hospital, Box 70, Middletown, CT 06457, USA.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006;34(4):479-81.
Recent actions by the American Psychiatric Association, the American Medical Association, and the American Psychological Association document a growing consensus that health professionals should not become directly involved in hostile interrogations. Challenging questions remain regarding the permissibility of indirect involvement, such as training directed toward promoting the humanity of interrogation procedures and the reliability of their results. A fundamental challenge comes from those who hold that a physician may relinquish the caring role and proceed to disregard medical ethics altogether. Some experts have even gone so far as to allege that all existing rules of medical ethics are baseless statements and thus cannot bind anyone. Forensic psychiatrists' continuing contributions to this debate are critical.
美国精神病学协会、美国医学协会和美国心理协会最近的行动表明,越来越多的人达成共识,即健康专业人员不应直接参与敌对审讯。关于间接参与的可允许性,仍存在具有挑战性的问题,例如旨在促进审讯程序人道性及其结果可靠性的培训。一个根本挑战来自那些认为医生可以放弃关怀角色并完全无视医学伦理的人。一些专家甚至声称,所有现有的医学伦理规则都是毫无根据的陈述,因此不能约束任何人。法医精神病学家对这场辩论的持续贡献至关重要。