A类G蛋白偶联受体高度保守的DRY基序:超越基态

The highly conserved DRY motif of class A G protein-coupled receptors: beyond the ground state.

作者信息

Rovati G Enrico, Capra Valérie, Neubig Richard R

机构信息

Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacological Sciences, University of Milan, Via Balzaretti 9, 20133 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Mol Pharmacol. 2007 Apr;71(4):959-64. doi: 10.1124/mol.106.029470. Epub 2006 Dec 27.

Abstract

Despite extensive study of heptahelical G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the precise mechanism of G protein activation is unknown. The role of one highly conserved stretch of residues, the amino acids glutamic acid/aspartic acid-arginine-tyrosine (i.e., the E/DRY motif), has received considerable attention with respect to regulating GPCR conformational states. In the consensus view, glutamic acid/aspartic acid maintains the receptor in its ground state, because mutations frequently induce constitutive activity (CA). This hypothesis has been confirmed by the rhodopsin ground-state crystal structure and by computational modeling approaches. However, some class A GPCRs are resistant to CA, suggesting alternative roles for the glutamic acid/aspartic acid residue and the E/DRY motif. Here, we propose two different subgroups of receptors within class A GPCRs that make different use of the E/DRY motif, independent of the G protein type (G(s), G(i), or G(q)) to which the receptor couples. In phenotype 1 receptors, nonconservative mutations of the glutamic acid/aspartic acid-arginine residues, besides inducing CA, increase affinity for agonist binding, retain G protein coupling, and retain an agonist-induced response. In contrast, in second phenotype receptors, the E/DRY motif is more directly involved in governing receptor conformation and G protein coupling/recognition. Hence, mutations of the glutamic acid/aspartic acid residues do not induce CA. Conversely, nonconservative mutations of the arginine of the E/DRY motif always impair agonist-induced receptor responses and, generally, reduce agonist binding affinity. Thus, it is essential to look beyond the rhodopsin ground-state model of conformational activation to clarify the role of this highly conserved triplet in GPCR activation and function.

摘要

尽管对七螺旋G蛋白偶联受体(GPCRs)进行了广泛研究,但G蛋白激活的确切机制仍不清楚。一段高度保守的残基序列,即谷氨酸/天冬氨酸-精氨酸-酪氨酸(即E/DRY基序)在调节GPCR构象状态方面受到了相当多的关注。在普遍观点中,谷氨酸/天冬氨酸使受体维持在其基态,因为突变经常诱导组成型活性(CA)。视紫红质基态晶体结构和计算建模方法已证实了这一假设。然而,一些A类GPCRs对CA有抗性,这表明谷氨酸/天冬氨酸残基和E/DRY基序具有其他作用。在此,我们提出A类GPCRs中的两个不同亚组,它们对E/DRY基序的利用方式不同,与受体偶联的G蛋白类型(G(s)、G(i)或G(q))无关。在表型1受体中,谷氨酸/天冬氨酸-精氨酸残基的非保守突变除了诱导CA外,还增加了对激动剂结合的亲和力,保留了G蛋白偶联,并保留了激动剂诱导的反应。相反,在第二表型受体中,E/DRY基序更直接地参与控制受体构象和G蛋白偶联/识别。因此,谷氨酸/天冬氨酸残基的突变不会诱导CA。相反,E/DRY基序中精氨酸的非保守突变总是损害激动剂诱导的受体反应,并且通常会降低激动剂结合亲和力。因此,有必要超越视紫红质构象激活的基态模型,以阐明这个高度保守的三联体在GPCR激活和功能中的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索