Bhattacharya Supriyo, Hall Spencer E, Vaidehi Nagarajan
Division of Immunology, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA-91010, USA.
J Mol Biol. 2008 Oct 3;382(2):539-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.06.084. Epub 2008 Jul 7.
Activation of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is initiated by conformational changes in the transmembrane (TM) helices and the intra- and extracellular loops induced by ligand binding. Understanding the conformational changes in GPCRs leading to activation is imperative in deciphering the role of these receptors in the pathology of diseases. Since the crystal structures of activated GPCRs are not yet available, computational methods and biophysical techniques have been used to predict the structures of GPCR active states. We have recently applied the computational method LITiCon to understand the ligand-induced conformational changes in beta(2)-adrenergic receptor by ligands of varied efficacies. Here we report a study of the conformational changes associated with the activation of bovine rhodopsin for which the crystal structure of the inactive state is known. Starting from the inactive (dark) state, we have predicted the TM conformational changes that are induced by the isomerization of 11-cis retinal to all-trans retinal leading to the fully activated state, metarhodopsin II. The predicted active state of rhodopsin satisfies all of the 30 known experimental distance constraints. The predicted model also correlates well with the experimentally observed conformational switches in rhodopsin and other class A GPCRs, namely, the breaking of the ionic lock between R135(3.50) at the intracellular end of TM3 (part of the DRY motif) and E247(6.30) on TM6, and the rotamer toggle switch on W265(6.48) on TM6. We observe that the toggling of the W265(6.48) rotamer modulates the bend angle of TM6 around the conserved proline. The rotamer toggling is facilitated by the formation of a water wire connecting S298(7.45), W265(6.48) and H211(5.46). As a result, the intracellular ends of TMs 5 and 6 move outward from the protein core, causing large conformational changes at the cytoplasmic interface. The predicted outward movements of TM5 and TM6 are in agreement with the recently published crystal structure of opsin, which is proposed to be close to the active-state structure. In the predicted active state, several residues in the intracellular loops, such as R69, V139(3.54), T229, Q237, Q239, S240, T243 and V250(6.33), become more water exposed compared to the inactive state. These residues may be involved in mediating the conformational signal from the receptor to the G protein. From mutagenesis studies, some of these residues, such as V139(3.54), T229 and V250(6.33), are already implicated in G-protein activation. The predicted active state also leads to the formation of new stabilizing interhelical hydrogen-bond contacts, such as those between W265(6.48) and H211(5.46) and E122(3.37) and C167(4.56). These hydrogen-bond contacts serve as potential conformational switches offering new opportunities for future experimental investigations. The calculated retinal binding energy surface shows that binding of an agonist makes the receptor dynamic and flexible and accessible to many conformations, while binding of an inverse agonist traps the receptor in the inactive state and makes the other conformations inaccessible.
G蛋白偶联受体(GPCRs)的激活是由配体结合诱导的跨膜(TM)螺旋以及细胞内和细胞外环的构象变化引发的。了解导致GPCRs激活的构象变化对于解读这些受体在疾病病理学中的作用至关重要。由于尚未获得激活态GPCRs的晶体结构,因此已采用计算方法和生物物理技术来预测GPCRs活性状态的结构。我们最近应用计算方法LITiCon来了解不同效能的配体诱导的β2 - 肾上腺素能受体的构象变化。在此,我们报告一项关于与牛视紫红质激活相关的构象变化的研究,其非活性状态的晶体结构是已知的。从非活性(暗)状态开始,我们预测了由11 - 顺式视黄醛异构化为全反式视黄醛导致完全激活状态即变视紫红质II所诱导的TM构象变化。预测的视紫红质活性状态满足所有30个已知的实验距离约束。预测模型还与视紫红质和其他A类GPCRs中实验观察到的构象转换密切相关,即TM3细胞内末端(DRY基序的一部分)的R135(3.50)与TM6上的E247(6.30)之间的离子锁断裂,以及TM6上W265(6.48)的旋转异构体切换开关。我们观察到W265(6.48)旋转异构体的切换调节了TM6围绕保守脯氨酸的弯曲角度。通过形成连接S298(7.45)、W265(6.48)和H211(5.46)的水线促进了旋转异构体的切换。结果,TM5和TM6的细胞内末端从蛋白质核心向外移动,在细胞质界面处引起大的构象变化。预测的TM5和TM6向外移动与最近发表的视蛋白晶体结构一致,该结构被认为接近活性状态结构。在预测的活性状态下,与非活性状态相比,细胞内环中的几个残基,如R69、V139(3.54)、T229、Q237、Q239、S240、T243和V250(6.33),变得更易暴露于水中。这些残基可能参与介导从受体到G蛋白的构象信号。从诱变研究来看,这些残基中的一些,如V139(3.54)、T229和V250(6.33),已经与G蛋白激活有关。预测的活性状态还导致形成新的稳定螺旋间氢键接触,如W265(6.48)与H211(5.46)以及E122(3.37)与C167(4.56)之间的氢键接触。这些氢键接触作为潜在的构象开关为未来的实验研究提供了新机会。计算得到的视黄醛结合能表面表明,激动剂的结合使受体具有动态性和灵活性,可接近多种构象,而反向激动剂的结合将受体捕获在非活性状态并使其他构象无法接近。