• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[早期干预对婴幼儿听力损失的疗效]

[The efficacy of early intervention for infants and toddlers with hearing loss].

作者信息

Zhang Feng-hua, Jin Xing-ming, Shen Xiao-ming, Wu Hao

机构信息

Department of Child Health Care, Xinhua Hospital, Medical College, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200092, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Oct 31;86(40):2836-40.

PMID:17200020
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of early intervention on language, pronunciation and cognitive developments of infants and toddlers with hearing loss and to build up an early intervention model.

METHODS

Fifty-six children with moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss aged 10 months to 2 years were divided into two groups. 20 children, aged 10 months to 2 years, received early intervention services after wearing hearing aids for 6 - 18 months, and 36 children, aged 11 months to 2 years, didn't receive any intervention. The type and degree of hearing loss were measured by a series of auditory tests. Language and cognitive developments of the children with hearing loss and 28 age, and sex-matched children with normal hearing, aged 10 to 23 months, were evaluated by the Gesell developmental schedules. The results were expressed as developmental quotient (DQ). Pronunciation test in mandarin Chinese was adopted to evaluate the speech development of the 56 children with hearing loss.

RESULTS

(1) The language DQ according the Gesell developmental schedules of the children with hearing loss who received early intervention was (92.25 +/- 17.32), significantly higher than those children with hearing loss who didn't receive intervention (70.44 +/- 29.99, P = 0.00), whish was significantly lower than that of the normal hearing children (P = 0.00). However, there was no significant difference in language DQ between the children who received early intervention and the normal hearing children. There was no significant correlation between the degree of hearing loss and language DQ in the children who received early intervention (P = 0.27). (2) The personal-social developmental quotient (DQ) of the children who received intervention was (101.40 +/- 7.66), significantly higher than that of the children who didn't receive intervention (83.94 +/- 22.09, P = 0.00), that were significantly lower than that of the children with normal hearing (P = 0.00). However, there were no significant difference in the personal-social DQ between the children who received early intervention and the children with normal hearing. No significant differences in the gross motor ability, fine motor ability and adaptive ability were observed between the two groups of children with hearing loss and normal hearing children. (3) The consonant pronunciation of the children with moderate to severe hearing loss who received early intervention was normal. Among those children only one case with profound hearing loss had/d/error. The consonant pronunciation of the children with moderate hearing loss who didn't receive early intervention of those was normal. One case with moderate-severe hearing loss and one case with severe hearing loss had/d/errors. Six cases with profound hearing loss had/d, m/errors. The tone of the children with moderate to severe hearing loss who received early intervention was normal. Three cases with profound hearing loss exhibited tone errors. Among the children who didn't receive early intervention, tone errors were found in two cases with moderate hearing loss, one case with moderate-severe hearing loss, one case with severe hearing loss, and twelve cases with profound hearing loss showed.

CONCLUSION

The language, pronunciation and cognitive developments of the children who don't receive early intervention are significantly lower than those of the children with normal hearing. Early intervention can significantly improve the language, speech and cognitive abilities of children with hearing loss.

摘要

目的

探讨早期干预对听力损失婴幼儿语言、发音及认知发育的效果,并建立早期干预模式。

方法

将56例年龄在10个月至2岁的中重度感音神经性听力损失儿童分为两组。20例年龄在10个月至2岁的儿童在佩戴助听器6 - 18个月后接受早期干预服务,36例年龄在11个月至2岁的儿童未接受任何干预。通过一系列听力测试测量听力损失的类型和程度。采用盖塞尔发育量表对听力损失儿童以及28例年龄、性别匹配的10至23个月听力正常儿童的语言和认知发育进行评估。结果以发育商(DQ)表示。采用汉语普通话发音测试评估56例听力损失儿童的言语发育情况。

结果

(1)接受早期干预的听力损失儿童根据盖塞尔发育量表得出的语言DQ为(92.25±17.32),显著高于未接受干预的听力损失儿童(70.44±29.99,P = 0.00),后者显著低于听力正常儿童(P = 0.00)。然而,接受早期干预的儿童与听力正常儿童之间的语言DQ无显著差异。接受早期干预的儿童中,听力损失程度与语言DQ之间无显著相关性(P = 0.27)。(2)接受干预的儿童的个人 - 社会发育商(DQ)为(101.40±7.66),显著高于未接受干预的儿童(83.94±22.09,P = 0.00),后者显著低于听力正常儿童(P = 0.00)。然而,接受早期干预的儿童与听力正常儿童之间的个人 - 社会DQ无显著差异。两组听力损失儿童与听力正常儿童在大运动能力、精细运动能力和适应能力方面未观察到显著差异。(3)接受早期干预的中重度听力损失儿童的辅音发音正常。在这些儿童中,仅1例极重度听力损失儿童存在/d/音错误。未接受早期干预的中度听力损失儿童的辅音发音正常。1例中重度听力损失儿童和1例重度听力损失儿童存在/d/音错误。6例极重度听力损失儿童存在/d、m/音错误。接受早期干预的中重度听力损失儿童的声调正常。3例极重度听力损失儿童出现声调错误。在未接受早期干预的儿童中,2例中度听力损失儿童、1例中重度听力损失儿童、1例重度听力损失儿童出现声调错误,12例极重度听力损失儿童出现声调错误。

结论

未接受早期干预的儿童的语言、发音及认知发育显著低于听力正常儿童。早期干预可显著提高听力损失儿童的语言、言语及认知能力。

相似文献

1
[The efficacy of early intervention for infants and toddlers with hearing loss].[早期干预对婴幼儿听力损失的疗效]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Oct 31;86(40):2836-40.
2
The value of Gesell score in predicting the outcome of cochlear implantation in children.格塞尔评分在预测儿童人工耳蜗植入结局中的价值。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jul;274(7):2757-2763. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4601-0. Epub 2017 May 17.
3
Early language development in children with profound hearing loss fitted with a device at a young age: part II--content of the first lexicon.自幼佩戴助听设备的极重度听力损失儿童的早期语言发展:第二部分——首个词汇库的内容
Ear Hear. 2009 Oct;30(5):541-51. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181aa00ea.
4
A descriptive analysis of language and speech skills in 4- to 5-yr-old children with hearing loss.对 4 至 5 岁听力损失儿童的语言和言语技能进行描述性分析。
Ear Hear. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):605-16. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31821348ae.
5
Hearing assessment in pre-school children with speech delay.对有语言发育迟缓的学龄前儿童进行听力评估。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2006 Sep;33(3):259-63. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2005.11.013. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
6
Listen up: children with early identified hearing loss achieve age-appropriate speech/language outcomes by 3 years-of-age.听好了:早期确诊听力损失的儿童到3岁时能实现与年龄相符的言语/语言发育成果。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Dec;76(12):1785-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
7
[Long-term follow-up of oral language development in children with permanent bilateral hearing loss].[永久性双侧听力损失儿童口语发展的长期随访]
Gesundheitswesen. 2007 Apr;69(4):249-55. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-976515.
8
Comparison of outcomes in children with hearing aids and cochlear implants.助听器与人工耳蜗植入儿童的疗效比较。
Cochlear Implants Int. 2012 Feb;13(1):5-15. doi: 10.1179/146701011X12950038111611.
9
Typical consonant cluster acquisition in auditory-verbal children with early-identified severe/profound hearing loss.早期确诊为重度/极重度听力损失的听障儿童通过听觉言语康复对典型辅音连缀的习得情况。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 Feb;16(1):69-81. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2013.808698. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
10
Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study.瑞典听力受损学龄前儿童群体的言语和语言发展:一项横断面研究
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Jul;71(7):1061-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.03.016. Epub 2007 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical rehabilitation for sensorineural hearing loss in childhood: Progress and challenges.儿童感音神经性听力损失的物理康复:进展与挑战
World J Clin Cases. 2025 Mar 6;13(7):97847. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i7.97847.