Ash Major M
University of Michigan, USA.
Head Face Med. 2007 Jan 3;3:1. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-3-1.
The paradigmatic shift to evidence-based dentistry (EBD) that relates to occlusal therapy, selective occlusal adjustment (OA) and stabilization splints therapy (SS) for TMDs has had an unfavourable impact on the teaching of many of the important aspects of occlusion needed in dental practice. The teaching of OA systematically in dental schools has been nearly abandoned because of the belief that OA is an irreversible procedure and gives the impression that it is without merit elsewhere in the management of occlusion. However, a particular dose of knowledge and practice of occlusion that is necessary for all aspects of dental care should be taught systematically in dental schools. The uses and misuses of OA and SS and their limitations should be emphasized because of their importance to bring clinical reality into the dental curriculum. Thus, and irrespective of EBD induced contradictions, OA and SS should still have a significant place in systematically teaching of occlusal therapy. However, there are many more aspects of the management of occlusion that should to be considered. Hopefully, because of their importance, other aspects of the management of occlusion will once again become a significant part of the dental curriculum.
向循证牙科(EBD)的范式转变涉及颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMDs)的咬合治疗、选择性咬合调整(OA)和稳定合板治疗(SS),这对牙科实践中所需的许多重要咬合方面的教学产生了不利影响。由于认为OA是一种不可逆的程序,并且给人一种在咬合管理的其他方面没有价值的印象,牙科学校中系统地教授OA的情况几乎已被放弃。然而,牙科学校应该系统地教授牙科护理各个方面所需的特定剂量的咬合知识和实践。由于OA和SS对于将临床实际情况纳入牙科课程很重要,因此应强调它们的使用和误用及其局限性。因此,无论循证牙科引发的矛盾如何,OA和SS在咬合治疗系统教学中仍应占有重要地位。然而,咬合管理还有许多其他方面需要考虑。希望由于其重要性,咬合管理的其他方面将再次成为牙科课程的重要组成部分。