Suresh Madathilparambil V, Singh Sanjay K, Ferguson Donald A, Agrawal Alok
Department of Pharmacology, James H. Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614.
Department of Microbiology, James H. Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614.
J Immunol. 2007 Jan 15;178(2):1158-1163. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.2.1158.
Human C-reactive protein (CRP) protects mice from lethality after infection with virulent Streptococcus pneumoniae type 3. For CRP-mediated protection, the complement system is required; however, the role of complement activation by CRP in the protection is not defined. Based on the in vitro properties of CRP, it has been assumed that protection of mice begins with the binding of CRP to pneumococcal C-polysaccharide on S. pneumoniae and subsequent activation of the mouse complement system. In this study, we explored the mechanism of CRP-mediated protection by utilizing two CRP mutants, F66A and F66A/E81A. Both mutants, unlike wild-type CRP, do not bind live virulent S. pneumoniae. We found that passively administered mutant CRP protected mice from infection as effectively as the wild-type CRP did. Infected mice injected with wild-type CRP or with mutant CRP lived longer and had lower mortality than mice that did not receive CRP. Extended survival was caused by the persistence of reduced bacteremia in mice treated with any CRP. We conclude that the CRP-mediated decrease in bacteremia and the resulting protection of mice are independent of an interaction between CRP and the pathogen and therefore are independent of the ability of CRP to activate mouse complement. It has been shown previously that the Fcgamma receptors also do not contribute to such CRP-mediated protection. Combined data lead to the speculation that CRP acts on the effector cells of the immune system to enhance cell-mediated cytotoxicity and suggest investigation into the possibility of using CRP-loaded APC-based strategy to treat microbial infections.
人C反应蛋白(CRP)可保护小鼠免受3型强毒肺炎链球菌感染后的致死作用。对于CRP介导的保护作用,补体系统是必需的;然而,CRP激活补体在这种保护作用中的角色尚未明确。基于CRP的体外特性,人们推测对小鼠的保护始于CRP与肺炎链球菌上的肺炎球菌C多糖结合,随后激活小鼠补体系统。在本研究中,我们利用两个CRP突变体F66A和F66A/E81A探索了CRP介导保护作用的机制。与野生型CRP不同,这两个突变体均不与活的强毒肺炎链球菌结合。我们发现,被动给予的突变体CRP对小鼠感染的保护效果与野生型CRP一样有效。注射野生型CRP或突变体CRP的感染小鼠比未接受CRP的小鼠存活时间更长且死亡率更低。延长的生存期是由于用任何一种CRP处理的小鼠中菌血症持续减少所致。我们得出结论,CRP介导的菌血症减少及由此对小鼠的保护作用独立于CRP与病原体之间的相互作用,因此也独立于CRP激活小鼠补体的能力。先前已表明,Fcγ受体也不参与这种CRP介导的保护作用。综合数据引发推测,CRP作用于免疫系统的效应细胞以增强细胞介导的细胞毒性,并建议研究使用基于负载CRP的抗原呈递细胞策略治疗微生物感染的可能性。