Bagchi Aranya, Herrup Elizabeth A, Warren H Shaw, Trigilio James, Shin Hae-Sook, Valentine Catherine, Hellman Judith
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
J Immunol. 2007 Jan 15;178(2):1164-71. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.2.1164.
TLRs sense components of microorganisms and are critical host mediators of inflammation during infection. Different TLR agonists can profoundly alter inflammatory effects of one another, and studies suggest that the sequence of exposure to TLR agonists may importantly impact on responses during infection. We tested the hypothesis that synergy, priming, and tolerance between TLR agonists follow a pattern that can be predicted based on differential engagement of the MyD88-dependent (D) and the MyD88-independent (I) intracellular signaling pathways. Inflammatory effects of combinations of D and I pathway agonists were quantified in vivo and in vitro. Experiments used several D-specific agonists, an I-specific agonist (poly(I:C)), and LPS, which acts through both the D and I pathways. D-specific agonists included: peptidoglycan-associated lipoprotein, Pam3Cys, flagellin, and CpG DNA, which act through TLR2 (peptidoglycan-associated lipoprotein and Pam3Cys), TLR5, and TLR9, respectively. D and I agonists were markedly synergistic in inducing cytokine production in vivo in mice. All of the D-specific agonists were synergistic with poly(I:C) in vitro in inducing TNF and IL-6 production by mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages. Pretreatment of bone marrow-derived macrophages with poly(I:C) led to a primed response to subsequent D-specific agonists and vice versa, as indicated by increased cytokine production, and increased NF-kappaB translocation. Pretreatment with a D-specific agonist augmented LPS-induced IFN-beta production. All D-specific agonists induced tolerance to one another. Thus, under the conditions studied here, simultaneous and sequential activation of both the D and I pathways causes synergy and priming, respectively, and tolerance is induced by agonists that act through the same pathway.
Toll样受体(TLRs)可识别微生物成分,是感染期间炎症反应的关键宿主介质。不同的TLR激动剂可显著改变彼此的炎症效应,并且研究表明,接触TLR激动剂的顺序可能对感染期间的反应产生重要影响。我们检验了这样一种假设,即TLR激动剂之间的协同、启动和耐受遵循一种可基于髓样分化因子88(MyD88)依赖性(D)和MyD88非依赖性(I)细胞内信号通路的不同参与情况进行预测的模式。在体内和体外对D和I通路激动剂组合的炎症效应进行了定量分析。实验使用了几种D特异性激动剂、一种I特异性激动剂(聚肌苷酸:聚胞苷酸,poly(I:C))以及通过D和I两条通路发挥作用的脂多糖(LPS)。D特异性激动剂包括:肽聚糖相关脂蛋白、Pam3Cys、鞭毛蛋白和CpG DNA,它们分别通过TLR2(肽聚糖相关脂蛋白和Pam3Cys)、TLR5和TLR9发挥作用。D和I激动剂在诱导小鼠体内细胞因子产生方面具有显著协同作用。所有D特异性激动剂在体外与poly(I:C)协同,可诱导小鼠骨髓来源的巨噬细胞产生肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)和白细胞介素6(IL-6)。用poly(I:C)预处理骨髓来源的巨噬细胞会导致对随后的D特异性激动剂产生启动反应,反之亦然,表现为细胞因子产生增加以及核因子κB(NF-κB)转位增加。用D特异性激动剂预处理可增强LPS诱导的干扰素β(IFN-β)产生。所有D特异性激动剂相互之间均诱导耐受。因此,在本研究的条件下,D和I两条通路的同时激活和顺序激活分别导致协同和启动,而通过相同通路发挥作用的激动剂会诱导耐受。