Suppr超能文献

在人工混响噪声环境下对两种辅助定向麦克风系统对人工耳蜗植入者的益处评估。

Evaluation of the benefit for cochlear implantees of two assistive directional microphone systems in an artificial diffuse noise situation.

作者信息

van der Beek F B, Soede W, Frijns J H M

机构信息

ENT Department, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2007 Feb;28(1):99-110. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31802d0a55.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

People with cochlear implants have severe problems with speech understanding in noisy surroundings. This study evaluates and quantifies the effect of two assistive directional microphone systems compared to the standard headpiece microphone on speech perception in quiet surroundings and in background noise, in a laboratory setting developed to reflect a situation whereby the listener is disturbed by a noise with a mainly diffuse character due to many sources in a reverberant room.

DESIGN

Thirteen postlingually deafened patients, implanted in the Leiden University Medical Centre with the Clarion CII device, participated in the study. An experimental set-up with 8 uncorrelated steady-state noise sources was used to test speech perception on monosyllabic words. Each subject was tested with a standard headpiece microphone, and the two assistive directional microphones, TX3 Handymic by Phonak and the Linkit array microphone by Etymotic Research. Testing was done in quiet at a level of 65 dB SPL and with decreasing signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) down to -15 dB.

RESULTS

Using the assistive directional microphones, speech recognition in background noise improved substantially and was not affected in quiet. At an SNR of 0 dB, the average CVC scores improved from 45% for the headpiece microphone to 67% and 62% for the TX3 Handymic and the Linkit respectively. Compared to the headpiece, the Speech Reception Threshold (SRT) improved by 8.2 dB SNR and 5.9 dB SNR for the TX3 Handymic and the Linkit respectively. The gain in SRT for TX3 Handymic and Linkit was neither correlated to the SRT score with headpiece nor the duration of CI-use.

CONCLUSION

The speech recognition test in background noise showed a clear benefit from the assistive directional microphones for cochlear implantees compared to the standard microphone. In a noisy environment, the significant benefit from these assistive device microphones may allow understanding of speech with greater ease.

摘要

目的

人工耳蜗植入者在嘈杂环境中存在严重的言语理解问题。本研究在一个模拟混响室内有多个声源导致噪声主要呈扩散特性从而干扰听者的实验室环境中,评估并量化两种辅助定向麦克风系统与标准头戴式麦克风相比,对安静环境及背景噪声下言语感知的影响。

设计

13名在莱顿大学医学中心植入Clarion CII设备的语后聋患者参与了本研究。采用一个带有8个不相关稳态噪声源的实验装置来测试对单音节词的言语感知。每位受试者分别使用标准头戴式麦克风、两种辅助定向麦克风进行测试,这两种辅助定向麦克风分别是峰力公司的TX3手持麦克风和逸美声学研究公司的Linkit阵列麦克风。测试在65 dB SPL的安静环境下进行,并将信噪比(SNR)降低至-15 dB。

结果

使用辅助定向麦克风时,背景噪声中的言语识别能力显著提高,且在安静环境中不受影响。在SNR为0 dB时,平均CVC得分从头戴式麦克风的45%分别提高到TX3手持麦克风的67%和Linkit的62%。与头戴式麦克风相比,TX3手持麦克风和Linkit的言语接受阈值(SRT)分别提高了8.2 dB SNR和5.9 dB SNR。TX3手持麦克风和Linkit的SRT增益与头戴式麦克风的SRT得分以及人工耳蜗使用时长均无相关性。

结论

与标准麦克风相比,背景噪声中的言语识别测试表明辅助定向麦克风对人工耳蜗植入者有明显益处。在嘈杂环境中,这些辅助设备麦克风带来的显著益处可能使言语理解更加容易。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验