Kadish A H, Schmaltz S, Morady F
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Sep;14(9):1393-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb02885.x.
The degree of variability in ventricular refractoriness and factors potentially affecting this variability were evaluated in 80 patients undergoing an electrophysiological study. Each of seven variables (stimulation current, coupling interval of the basic drive train to spontaneous rhythm, pause between determinations, bipolar pacing configuration, bipolar vs unipolar pacing, atrioventricular synchrony, and autonomic tone) was evaluated in a group of ten patients to determine its effects on the reproducibility of refractoriness. Measurements were repeated ten times in every patient under each of two conditions. Five variables had significant effects on the reproducibility of measurements. Pacing at 10 mA was associated with less variability in the determination of ventricular refractoriness than pacing at twice threshold (within-subject variance component 4.5 vs 10.1 msec; P less than 0.001). The mean difference between the longest and shortest determinations of refractory periods (range) was 6.2 msec at 10 mA and 8.6 msec at twice threshold. The use of a conditioning period of pacing and continuous trains (eight beats with a 3-sec pause) rather than a variable pause between serial trials reduced the mean within-subject variance component from 16.5 to 3.3 (P less than 0.001) and the mean range of refractory period determinations from 10.8 to 4.8. The use of the distal rather than the proximal pole as the cathode decreased the mean within-subject variance component from 9.4 to 3.3 (P less than 0.001) and the range of determinations from 6.4 to 5.8 msec. Unipolar pacing was associated with less variability than bipolar pacing (mean within-subject variance component 4.6 vs 6.4; P less than 0.05, mean range 5.0 vs 7.6 msec).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对80例接受电生理研究的患者的心室不应期变异性程度以及可能影响该变异性的因素进行了评估。在一组10例患者中对七个变量(刺激电流、基础驱动序列与自发节律的耦合间期、测定之间的间期、双极起搏配置、双极与单极起搏、房室同步性和自主神经张力)中的每一个进行评估,以确定其对不应期可重复性的影响。在两种条件下,对每位患者的测量均重复10次。五个变量对测量的可重复性有显著影响。与两倍阈值起搏相比,10毫安起搏时心室不应期测定的变异性较小(受试者内方差分量为4.5对10.1毫秒;P<0.001)。10毫安时不应期最长与最短测定之间的平均差值(范围)为6.2毫秒,两倍阈值时为8.6毫秒。采用起搏和连续序列(8次搏动,间隔3秒)的条件期而非系列试验之间的可变间期,可使受试者内平均方差分量从16.5降至3.3(P<0.001),不应期测定的平均范围从10.8降至4.8。使用远端而非近端电极作为阴极,可使受试者内平均方差分量从9.4降至3.3(P<0.001),测定范围从6.4降至5.8毫秒。单极起搏比双极起搏的变异性小(受试者内平均方差分量为4.6对6.4;P<0.05,平均范围为5.0对7.6毫秒)。(摘要截短于250字)