Groffman Peter M, Altabet Mark A, Böhlke J K, Butterbach-Bahl Klaus, David Mark B, Firestone Mary K, Giblin Anne E, Kana Todd M, Nielsen Lars Peter, Voytek Mary A
Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Box AB, Millbrook, New York 12545, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2006 Dec;16(6):2091-122. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2091:mfmdda]2.0.co;2.
Denitrification, the reduction of the nitrogen (N) oxides, nitrate (NO3-) and nitrite (NO2-), to the gases nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide (N2O), and dinitrogen (N2), is important to primary production, water quality, and the chemistry and physics of the atmosphere at ecosystem, landscape, regional, and global scales. Unfortunately, this process is very difficult to measure, and existing methods are problematic for different reasons in different places at different times. In this paper, we review the major approaches that have been taken to measure denitrification in terrestrial and aquatic environments and discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and future prospects for the different methods. Methodological approaches covered include (1) acetylene-based methods, (2) 15N tracers, (3) direct N2 quantification, (4) N2:Ar ratio quantification, (5) mass balance approaches, (6) stoichiometric approaches, (7) methods based on stable isotopes, (8) in situ gradients with atmospheric environmental tracers, and (9) molecular approaches. Our review makes it clear that the prospects for improved quantification of denitrification vary greatly in different environments and at different scales. While current methodology allows for the production of accurate estimates of denitrification at scales relevant to water and air quality and ecosystem fertility questions in some systems (e.g., aquatic sediments, well-defined aquifers), methodology for other systems, especially upland terrestrial areas, still needs development. Comparison of mass balance and stoichiometric approaches that constrain estimates of denitrification at large scales with point measurements (made using multiple methods), in multiple systems, is likely to propel more improvement in denitrification methods over the next few years.
反硝化作用是指将氮氧化物、硝酸盐(NO3-)和亚硝酸盐(NO2-)还原为气体一氧化氮(NO)、一氧化二氮(N2O)和氮气(N2)的过程,这一过程在生态系统、景观、区域和全球尺度上对初级生产、水质以及大气的化学和物理性质都非常重要。不幸的是,这个过程很难测量,而且现有的方法在不同时间、不同地点由于不同原因存在问题。在本文中,我们回顾了在陆地和水生环境中测量反硝化作用的主要方法,并讨论了不同方法的优缺点和未来前景。所涵盖的方法包括:(1)基于乙炔的方法;(2)15N示踪剂;(3)直接定量N2;(4)N2:Ar比率定量;(5)质量平衡法;(6)化学计量法;(7)基于稳定同位素的方法;(8)利用大气环境示踪剂的原位梯度法;(9)分子方法。我们的综述表明,在不同环境和不同尺度下,改进反硝化作用定量的前景差异很大。虽然目前的方法能够在与某些系统(如,水生沉积物、明确界定的含水层)的水质、空气质量和生态系统肥力问题相关的尺度上准确估计反硝化作用,但其他系统,特别是高地陆地区域的方法仍有待开发。在多个系统中,将大规模限制反硝化作用估计的质量平衡法和化学计量法与(使用多种方法进行的)点测量进行比较,可能会在未来几年推动反硝化作用测量方法取得更大进展。