Suppr超能文献

针对老年人的戒烟干预措施的有效性。

Effectiveness of a smoking cessation intervention in older adults.

作者信息

Tait Robert J, Hulse Gary K, Waterreus Anna, Flicker Leon, Lautenschlager Nicola T, Jamrozik Konrad, Almeida Osvaldo P

机构信息

School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Addiction. 2007 Jan;102(1):148-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01647.x.

Abstract

AIMS

To: (a) identify characteristics of older smokers considering cessation of smoking; (b) evaluate a cessation intervention plus access to nicotine replacement therapy (NRT); (c) identify predictors of those who successfully quit; and (d) evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention in those AGED >or = 75 years.

DESIGN

Self-selection of: (a) a cessation of smoking programme; or (b) ongoing smoking.

SETTING

Teaching hospital, Perth, Western Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

A larger study recruited smokers and never smokers: from this the 215 community-dwelling smokers (>or= 5 cigarettes/day) aged >or= 68 years (171 males) were enrolled.

INTERVENTION

Brief intervention with telephone support and access to NRT versus no intervention.

MEASUREMENTS

(a) Profile of older adults planning to quit smoking compared with continuing smokers; (b) cessation at 6 months defined as 30-day point prevalence validated via expired carbon monoxide; and (c) factors predictive of successful cessation.

FINDINGS

There were 165 intervention participants. Compared with the 50 continuing smokers, participants in the intervention were younger and had significantly less years of regular smoking, more previous quit attempts and greater nicotine dependence scores. At 6 months, the point prevalence of ex-smokers was 25% (n = 42) with 20% (n = 33) being abstinent throughout the study. No continuing smoker had ceased smoking. Among the intervention group, logistic regression showed that those who used NRT (OR 4.36), were male (OR 3.17), had higher anxiety (OR 1.67) or rejected 'more colds and coughs' as a reason for quitting (OR 2.91) were more likely to be successful quitters. Of those aged >or= 75 years (n = 77), 25% matched cessation criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Older smokers can be engaged successfully in a brief intervention plus NRT as aids to cessation of smoking. The intervention was also effective in the older subgroup of participants. Social factors may provide an additional means of motivating older smokers to quit.

摘要

目的

(a) 确定考虑戒烟的老年吸烟者的特征;(b) 评估一种戒烟干预措施以及尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)的可及性;(c) 确定成功戒烟者的预测因素;(d) 评估该干预措施对年龄大于或等于75岁者的有效性。

设计

自我选择:(a) 参加一个戒烟项目;或(b) 继续吸烟。

地点

西澳大利亚州珀斯的一家教学医院。

参与者

一项规模更大的研究招募了吸烟者和从不吸烟者:从中选取了215名年龄大于或等于68岁(171名男性)、社区居住的吸烟者(每天吸烟≥5支)。

干预措施

有电话支持和可及NRT的简短干预措施与无干预措施。

测量指标

(a) 计划戒烟的老年人与继续吸烟者的概况比较;(b) 6个月时的戒烟情况定义为通过呼出一氧化碳验证的30天时间点患病率;(c) 成功戒烟的预测因素。

研究结果

有165名参与者接受了干预。与50名继续吸烟者相比,接受干预的参与者更年轻,有规律吸烟的年限显著更少,之前尝试戒烟的次数更多,尼古丁依赖得分更高。6个月时,已戒烟者的时间点患病率为25%(n = 42),整个研究期间持续戒烟者占20%(n = 33)。没有继续吸烟者戒烟。在干预组中,逻辑回归显示,使用NRT者(比值比4.36)、男性(比值比3.17)、焦虑程度较高者(比值比1.67)或拒绝将“更多感冒和咳嗽”作为戒烟理由者(比值比2.91)更有可能成功戒烟。在年龄大于或等于75岁者(n = 77)中,25%符合戒烟标准。

结论

老年吸烟者能够成功参与一项简短干预措施并借助NRT来帮助戒烟。该干预措施在年龄较大的参与者亚组中也有效。社会因素可能为激励老年吸烟者戒烟提供额外手段。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验