Skedgel C, Rayson D, Dewar R, Younis T
Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Breast. 2007 Jun;16(3):252-61. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2006.12.002. Epub 2007 Jan 4.
This evaluation adapts a previous Canadian analysis of upfront and sequential adjuvant AI strategies in postmenopausal women with breast cancer to a Belgian perspective and includes an extended aromatase inhibitor (AI) strategy. A Markov model calculated monthly costs and outcomes in a hypothetical cohort of postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. Baseline event rates and hazard ratios were derived from the Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination trial, International Exemestane Study and MA.17 trials. The analysis took a Belgian healthcare payer perspective with a 20-year time horizon. Costs and outcomes were discounted by 3%. Costs are in 2005 Euros. The cost-utility of all three strategies was favourable (<30,000 euros per QALY gained). Based on indirect comparisons using tamoxifen (TAM) alone as a common comparator, sequential TAM-AI was less costly and more effective than upfront or extended strategies. All three AI strategies were cost-effective alternatives to TAM alone, but sequential TAM-AI appears to be the economically preferred strategy.
本评估将先前加拿大对绝经后乳腺癌女性的初始及序贯辅助芳香化酶抑制剂(AI)策略分析转换为比利时视角,并纳入了一种扩展的芳香化酶抑制剂(AI)策略。一个马尔可夫模型计算了绝经后早期乳腺癌假设队列中的每月成本和结果。基线事件发生率和风险比源自阿那曲唑、单纯他莫昔芬或联合使用试验、国际依西美坦研究以及MA.17试验。该分析采用了比利时医疗保健支付者的视角,时间跨度为20年。成本和结果按3%进行贴现。成本以2005年欧元计。所有三种策略的成本效用均较为有利(每获得一个质量调整生命年<30,000欧元)。基于以单纯他莫昔芬(TAM)作为共同对照的间接比较,序贯TAM-AI比初始或扩展策略成本更低且更有效。所有三种AI策略都是单纯TAM的具有成本效益的替代方案,但序贯TAM-AI似乎是经济上更优的策略。