Butani Dimple, Gupta Nidhi, Jyani Gaurav, Bahuguna Pankaj, Kapoor Rakesh, Prinja Shankar
Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2021 Nov 27;13:625-640. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S331831. eCollection 2021.
Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer among women in India. Treatment with hormone therapy reduces recurrence. We undertook this cost-effectiveness study to ascertain the treatment option offering the best value for money.
The lifetime costs and health outcomes of using tamoxifen, AI and switch therapy were measured in a cohort of 50-year-old women with HR-positive early stage breast cancer. A Markov model of disease was developed using a societal perspective with a lifetime study horizon. Local, contralateral, and distant recurrence were modelled along with treatment related adverse effects. Primary data collected to obtain estimates of out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) and utility weights. Both health system cost and OOPE were included. The future costs and consequences were discounted at 3%. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used.
The lifetime cost of hormone therapy with tamoxifen, AI and switch therapy was to be ₹1,472,037 (I$ 68,947), ₹1,306,794 (I$ 61,208) and ₹1,281,811 (I$ 60,038). The QALYs lived per patient receiving tamoxifen, AI and switch were 13.12, 13.42 and 13.32. tamoxifen was found to be more expensive and less effective. As compared to switch therapy, AI for five years incurred an incremental cost of ₹259,792 (I$12,168) per QALY gained. At the willingness to pay equals to per capita GDP of India, there is 55% probability of AI therapy to be cost-effective compared to switch therapy.
In postmenopausal women with HR-positive early-stage breast cancer, switch therapy is recommended for use on the basis of cost-effectiveness.
在印度,乳腺癌是女性癌症的主要病因。激素疗法可降低复发率。我们开展了这项成本效益研究,以确定性价比最高的治疗方案。
在一组50岁的HR阳性早期乳腺癌女性中,测量他莫昔芬、芳香化酶抑制剂(AI)和转换疗法的终身成本和健康结局。采用社会视角,建立了一个疾病马尔可夫模型,研究期限为终身。对局部、对侧和远处复发以及与治疗相关的不良反应进行建模。收集原始数据以获得自付费用(OOPE)和效用权重的估计值。同时纳入了卫生系统成本和自付费用。未来成本和后果按3%进行贴现。采用概率敏感性分析。
他莫昔芬、AI和转换疗法的激素治疗终身成本分别为1,472,037卢比(68,947美元)、1,306,794卢比(61,208美元)和1,281,811卢比(60,038美元)。接受他莫昔芬、AI和转换疗法的每位患者的质量调整生命年(QALY)分别为13.12、13.42和13.32。发现他莫昔芬更昂贵且效果更差。与转换疗法相比,使用AI五年每获得一个QALY会产生259,792卢比(12,168美元)的增量成本。在支付意愿等于印度人均国内生产总值的情况下,与转换疗法相比,AI疗法具有成本效益的概率为55%。
对于HR阳性早期乳腺癌的绝经后女性,基于成本效益推荐使用转换疗法。