Chow Theodore, Kereiakes Dean J, Bartone Cheryl, Booth Terri, Schloss Edward J, Waller Theodore, Chung Eugene, Menon Santosh, Nallamothu Brahmajee K, Chan Paul S
The Lindner Clinical Trial Center at the Christ Hospital and the Ohio Heart and Vascular Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jan 2;49(1):50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.079. Epub 2006 Dec 13.
This study sought to assess whether implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have different mortality benefits among patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who screen negative and non-negative (positive and indeterminate) for microvolt T-wave alternans (MTWA).
Microvolt T-wave alternans has been proposed as an effective tool for risk stratification. However, no studies have examined whether ICD benefits differ by MTWA group.
We developed a prospective cohort of 768 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35%) and no prior sustained ventricular arrhythmia, of which 392 (51%) received ICDs. The mean follow-up time was 27 +/- 12 months. Propensity scores for ICD implantation based on the variables most likely to influence defibrillator implantation were developed for each MTWA cohort. Multivariable Cox analyses that controlled for propensity score, demographics, and clinical variables evaluated the degree to which ICDs decreased mortality risk for each MTWA group.
We identified 514 (67%) patients with a non-negative MTWA test result. After multivariable adjustment, ICDs were associated with lower all-cause mortality in MTWA-non-negative patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27 to 0.76, p = 0.003) but not in MTWA-negative patients (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.20, p = 0.73) (for interaction, p = 0.04), with the mortality benefit in MTWA-non-negative patients largely mediated through arrhythmic mortality reduction (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.68, p = 0.004). The number needed to treat with an ICD for 2 years to save 1 life was 9 among MTWA-non-negative patients and 76 among MTWA-negative patients.
In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and no prior history of ventricular arrhythmia, mortality reduction with ICD implantation differs by MTWA status, with implications for risk stratification and health policy.
本研究旨在评估对于缺血性心肌病患者,植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)在微伏级T波交替(MTWA)筛查结果为阴性和非阴性(阳性及不确定)的患者中,是否具有不同的降低死亡率的益处。
微伏级T波交替已被提议作为一种有效的风险分层工具。然而,尚无研究探讨ICD的益处是否因MTWA分组而异。
我们前瞻性纳入了768例缺血性心肌病患者(左心室射血分数≤35%)且既往无持续性室性心律失常,其中392例(51%)接受了ICD植入。平均随访时间为27±12个月。针对每个MTWA队列,根据最可能影响除颤器植入的变量制定ICD植入的倾向评分。多变量Cox分析控制了倾向评分、人口统计学和临床变量,评估ICD降低每个MTWA组死亡率风险的程度。
我们确定了514例(67%)MTWA检测结果为非阴性的患者。多变量调整后,ICD与MTWA非阴性患者全因死亡率降低相关(风险比[HR]0.45,95%置信区间[CI]0.27至0.76,p = 0.003),但与MTWA阴性患者无关(HR 0.85,95%CI 0.33至2.20,p = 0.73)(交互作用p = 0.04),MTWA非阴性患者的死亡率益处主要通过降低心律失常死亡率实现(HR 0.30,95%CI 0.13至0.68,p = 0.004)。MTWA非阴性患者中,ICD治疗2年挽救1例生命所需治疗人数为9,MTWA阴性患者为76。
在既往无室性心律失常病史的缺血性心肌病患者中,ICD植入降低死亡率的效果因MTWA状态而异,这对风险分层和卫生政策具有重要意义。