Cardiology Division, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Heart Rhythm. 2012 Aug;9(8):1256-64.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.03.014. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
Previous studies have demonstrated that microvolt T-wave alternans (MTWA) testing is a robust predictor of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in at-risk patients. However, recent studies have suggested that MTWA testing is not as good a predictor of "appropriate" implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy as it is a predictor of SCD in patients without ICDs.
To evaluate the utility of MTWA testing for SCD risk stratification in patients without ICDs.
Patient-level data were obtained from 5 prospective studies of MTWA testing in patients with no history of ventricular arrhythmia or SCD. In these studies, ICDs were implanted in only a minority of patients and patients with ICDs were excluded from the analysis. We conducted a pooled analysis and examined the 2-year risk for SCD based on the MTWA test result.
The pooled cohort included 2883 patients. MTWA testing was positive in 856 (30%), negative in 1627 (56%), and indeterminate in 400 (14%) patients. Among patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤35%, annual SCD event rates were 4.0%, 0.9%, and 4.6% among groups with MTWA positive, negative, and indeterminate test results. The SCD rate was significantly lower among patients with a negative MTWA test result than in patients with either positive or indeterminate MTWA test results (P <.001 for both comparisons). In patients with an LVEF of >35%, annual SCD event rates were 3.0%, 0.3%, and 0.3% among the groups with MTWA positive, negative, and indeterminate test results. The SCD rate associated with a positive MTWA test result was significantly higher than that associated with either negative (P <.001) or indeterminate MTWA test results (P = .003).
In patients without ICDs, MTWA testing is a powerful predictor of SCD. Among patients with an LVEF of ≤35%, a negative MTWA test result is associated with a low risk for SCD. Conversely, among patients with an LVEF of >35%, a positive MTWA test result identifies patients at significantly heightened SCD risk. These findings may have important implications for refining primary prevention ICD treatment algorithms.
先前的研究表明,微伏 T 波交替(MTWA)检测是预测高危患者室性心律失常和心脏性猝死(SCD)的有力指标。然而,最近的研究表明,MTWA 检测在预测无 ICD 患者的 SCD 方面并不像预测 SCD 那样是植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)治疗的良好预测指标。
评估 MTWA 检测在无 ICD 患者中的 SCD 风险分层中的效用。
从 5 项 MTWA 检测前瞻性研究中获取患者水平数据,这些研究对象均无室性心律失常或 SCD 病史。在这些研究中,仅少数患者植入了 ICD,且排除了有 ICD 的患者进行分析。我们进行了汇总分析,并根据 MTWA 检测结果检查了 2 年 SCD 风险。
汇总队列包括 2883 例患者。MTWA 检测阳性 856 例(30%),阴性 1627 例(56%),不确定 400 例(14%)。左心室射血分数(LVEF)≤35%的患者中,MTWA 检测阳性、阴性和不确定检测结果组的年 SCD 事件发生率分别为 4.0%、0.9%和 4.6%。MTWA 检测阴性组的 SCD 发生率明显低于 MTWA 检测阳性或不确定组(两者均<.001)。LVEF>35%的患者中,MTWA 检测阳性、阴性和不确定检测结果组的年 SCD 事件发生率分别为 3.0%、0.3%和 0.3%。MTWA 检测阳性结果与阴性(<.001)或不确定 MTWA 检测结果(P=.003)相比,SCD 发生率显著更高。
在无 ICD 的患者中,MTWA 检测是 SCD 的有力预测指标。LVEF≤35%的患者中,MTWA 检测阴性结果与 SCD 风险低相关。相反,LVEF>35%的患者中,MTWA 检测阳性结果提示 SCD 风险显著增加。这些发现可能对完善初级预防 ICD 治疗策略具有重要意义。