Burden Donald, Johnston Chris, Kennedy David, Harradine Nigel, Stevenson Mike
Orthodontic Division, Oral Healthcare Research Centre, School of Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jan;131(1):7.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.027.
INTRODUCTION: Class II malocclusion is often associated with retrognathic mandible. Some of these problems require surgical correction. The purposes of this study were to investigate treatment outcomes in patients with Class II malocclusions whose treatment included mandibular advancement surgery and to identify predictors of good outcomes. METHODS: Pretreatment and posttreatment cephalometric radiographs of 90 patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery by 57 consultant orthodontists in the United Kingdom before September 1998 were digitized, and cephalometric landmarks were identified. Paired samples t tests were used to compare the pretreatment and posttreatment cephalometric values for each patient. For each cephalometric variable, the proportion of patients falling within the ideal range was identified. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of achieving ideal range outcomes for the key skeletal (ANB and SNB angles), dental (overjet and overbite), and soft-tissue (Holdaway angle) measurements. RESULTS: An overjet within the ideal range of 1 to 4 mm was achieved in 72% of patients and was more likely with larger initial ANB angles. Horizontal correction of the incisor relationship was achieved by a combination of 75% skeletal movement and 25% dentoalveolar change. An ideal posttreatment ANB angle was achieved in 42% of patients and was more likely in females and those with larger pretreatment ANB angles. Ideal soft-tissue Holdaway angles (7 degrees to 14 degrees ) were achieved in 49% of patients and were more likely in females and those with smaller initial SNA angles. Mandibular incisor decompensation was incomplete in 28% of patients and was more likely in females and patients with greater pretreatment mandibular incisor proclination. Correction of increased overbite was generally successful, although anterior open bites were found in 16% of patients at the end of treatment. These patients were more likely to have had initial open bites. CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular surgery had a good success rate in normalizing the main dental and skeletal relationships. Less ideal soft-tissue profile outcomes were associated with larger pretreatment SNA-angle values, larger final mandibular incisor inclinations, and smaller final maxillary incisor inclinations. The use of mandibular surgery to correct anterior open bite was associated with poor outcomes.
引言:II类错牙合常与下颌后缩有关。其中一些问题需要手术矫正。本研究的目的是调查接受下颌前徙手术治疗的II类错牙合患者的治疗效果,并确定良好预后的预测因素。 方法:对1998年9月前英国57位正畸顾问医生治疗的90例接受下颌前徙手术患者的治疗前和治疗后头影测量X线片进行数字化处理,并确定头影测量标志点。采用配对样本t检验比较每位患者治疗前和治疗后的头影测量值。对于每个头影测量变量,确定落在理想范围内的患者比例。进行多因素逻辑回归分析,以确定关键骨骼(ANB和SNB角)、牙齿(覆盖和覆牙合)和软组织(Holdaway角)测量达到理想范围结果的预测因素。 结果:72%的患者覆盖达到1至4mm的理想范围,初始ANB角越大越有可能达到。切牙关系的水平矫正75%由骨骼移动和25%由牙牙槽变化共同完成。42%的患者治疗后ANB角达到理想值,女性和治疗前ANB角较大者更有可能达到。49%的患者软组织Holdaway角达到理想范围(7度至14度),女性和初始SNA角较小者更有可能达到。28%的患者下颌切牙去代偿不完全,女性和治疗前下颌切牙倾斜度较大的患者更有可能出现这种情况。覆牙合增加的矫正总体成功,尽管治疗结束时16%的患者出现前牙开牙合。这些患者更有可能最初就存在开牙合。 结论:下颌手术在使主要牙齿和骨骼关系正常化方面成功率较高。软组织侧貌结果不理想与治疗前SNA角值较大、最终下颌切牙倾斜度较大和最终上颌切牙倾斜度较小有关。使用下颌手术矫正前牙开牙合的效果较差。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007-1
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006-9
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009-1
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007-9
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000-6
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009-5
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018-6
J Clin Exp Dent. 2014-7-1