Suppr超能文献

非感染情况:漏斗胸修复术(Nuss手术)后金属过敏

When it is not an infection: metal allergy after the Nuss procedure for repair of pectus excavatum.

作者信息

Rushing Gregory D, Goretsky Michael J, Gustin Tina, Morales Maripaz, Kelly Robert E, Nuss Donald

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA 23507, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Jan;42(1):93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.09.056.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Increasing use of implantable bars for minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair has introduced metal allergy (nickel and chromium) to pediatric surgeons. Metal allergy is a well-recognized entity in neurologic, orthopedic, and craniofacial surgery. This study was performed to evaluate metal allergy and its effects on treatment with the Nuss procedure in 862 patients.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, we undertook a retrospective review of a prospectively gathered database of patients undergoing the Nuss procedure. Metal allergy was diagnosed either with the use of dermal patch or clinically, based on rash, fever, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, cultures, and pathology specimens. Data collection included demographics, an allergy to jewelry, and history of atopy. Clinical outcomes including need for reoperation, removal of stainless steel bar, and replacement with titanium bar were evaluated.

RESULTS

Over an 18-year period (1987-2005), 862 patients underwent the Nuss procedure. Nineteen (2.2%) were diagnosed with metal allergy, with an average age of 14.7 years (9-23 years). Eighteen (95%) were males. A history of atopy was present in 9 (56%) patients. Ten (63%) patients presented with rash and erythema, 1 (6%) with granuloma, 5 (32%) with pleural effusion, and 3 (15%) were diagnosed on preoperative screening. Stainless steel bars were removed because of allergic skin breakdown in 3 patients, with 2 patients requiring replacement titanium bars. In all 3 of these patients, symptoms resolved after removal of stainless steel bars. Titanium bars were placed in the 3 patients who were diagnosed preoperatively with metal allergy, without event.

CONCLUSIONS

Allergy symptoms often are misdiagnosed as infection, but require different treatment. If a history of metal allergy or atopy is suggested preoperatively, the patient should be tested for metal allergy, and if positive, a titanium bar used. Because the consequences of metal allergy may include the need to replace the bar, pediatric surgeons should be aware of this occurrence.

摘要

目的

可植入钢板在微创漏斗胸修复术中的使用日益增加,这使小儿外科医生面临金属过敏(镍和铬)问题。金属过敏在神经外科、骨科和颅面外科中是一个广为人知的现象。本研究旨在评估862例患者的金属过敏情况及其对努氏手术治疗的影响。

方法

经机构审查委员会批准后,我们对前瞻性收集的接受努氏手术患者的数据库进行了回顾性研究。金属过敏通过皮肤斑贴试验或根据皮疹、发热、红细胞沉降率升高、培养结果和病理标本进行临床诊断。数据收集包括人口统计学资料、对首饰的过敏情况和特应性病史。评估临床结局,包括再次手术的必要性、取出不锈钢钢板以及更换为钛合金钢板。

结果

在18年期间(1987 - 2005年),862例患者接受了努氏手术。19例(2.2%)被诊断为金属过敏,平均年龄14.7岁(9 - 23岁)。18例(95%)为男性。9例(56%)患者有特应性病史。10例(63%)患者出现皮疹和红斑,1例(6%)出现肉芽肿,5例(32%)出现胸腔积液,3例(15%)在术前筛查时被诊断。3例患者因过敏性皮肤破损而取出不锈钢钢板,其中2例患者需要更换钛合金钢板。在所有这3例患者中,取出不锈钢钢板后症状均得到缓解。3例术前被诊断为金属过敏的患者植入了钛合金钢板,未出现任何问题。

结论

过敏症状常被误诊为感染,但需要不同的治疗方法。如果术前提示有金属过敏或特应性病史,应检测患者是否对金属过敏,若结果为阳性,则使用钛合金钢板。由于金属过敏的后果可能包括需要更换钢板,小儿外科医生应了解这种情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验