O'Connell Kathleen A, Hosein Vanessa L, Schwartz Joseph E, Leibowitz Ruth Q
Department of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Health Psychol. 2007 Jan;26(1):77-84. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.1.77.
To determine whether types of coping strategies have differential effects on preventing lapses and lowering urge levels and to investigate mechanisms by which coping strategies prevent lapses during smoking cessation.
Sixty-one respondents performed ecological momentary assessment using palm-top computers and tape recorders to report their coping strategies and urge levels before and after temptations to smoke. Multilevel linear regression models were used to compare the effects of individual strategy types with the average strategy.
Lapses versus resisted temptations and changes in urge levels.
Number of strategies significantly predicted resisting smoking and change in urge levels. Compared with the effect of the average strategy, movement/exercise was marginally worse at preventing lapses, and food/drink was marginally related to higher postcoping urge levels.
Although using multiple coping strategies helps people resist the urge to smoke, no particular coping strategy works better than any other. Coping strategies prevent lapses by reducing high urge levels during temptations.
确定应对策略类型对预防复吸和降低冲动水平是否有不同影响,并研究应对策略在戒烟过程中预防复吸的机制。
61名受访者使用掌上电脑和录音机进行生态瞬时评估,以报告他们在受到吸烟诱惑之前和之后的应对策略及冲动水平。使用多水平线性回归模型比较个体策略类型与平均策略的效果。
复吸与抵制诱惑情况以及冲动水平的变化。
策略数量能显著预测抵制吸烟行为和冲动水平的变化。与平均策略的效果相比,运动在预防复吸方面略差,而食物/饮料与应对后较高的冲动水平略有关联。
虽然使用多种应对策略有助于人们抵制吸烟冲动,但没有哪种特定的应对策略比其他策略效果更好。应对策略通过在诱惑期间降低高冲动水平来预防复吸。