• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对方式和性别对情境应对的影响:一项使用移动健康应用程序TrackYourStress的生态瞬时评估研究

The Impact of Coping Styles and Gender on Situational Coping: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study With the mHealth Application TrackYourStress.

作者信息

O'Rourke Teresa, Vogel Carsten, John Dennis, Pryss Rüdiger, Schobel Johannes, Haug Fabian, Haug Julian, Pieh Christoph, Nater Urs M, Feneberg Anja C, Reichert Manfred, Probst Thomas

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, Krems an der Donau, Austria.

Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 20;13:913125. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913125. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913125
PMID:35795429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9252427/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of different coping styles on situational coping in everyday life situations and gender differences. An ecological momentary assessment study with the mobile health app TrackYourStress was conducted with 113 participants. The coping styles , , , , and of the Stress and Coping Inventory were measured at baseline. Situational coping was assessed by the question "How well can you cope with your momentary stress level" over 4 weeks. Multilevel models were conducted to test the effects of the coping styles on situational coping. Additionally, gender differences were evaluated. ( = 0.03) and ( = 0.04) had significant positive impacts on situational coping in the total sample. For women, had a significant positive effect on situational coping ( = 0.046). For men, had a significant positive effect on situational coping ( = 0.001). Women had higher scores on the SCI scale than men ( = 0.007). These results suggest that different coping styles could be more effective in daily life for women than for men. Taking this into account, interventions tailored to users' coping styles might lead to better coping outcomes than generalized interventions.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查不同应对方式对日常生活情境中情境应对的影响以及性别差异。我们使用移动健康应用程序TrackYourStress对113名参与者进行了一项生态瞬时评估研究。在基线时测量了压力与应对量表中的应对方式、、、、和。通过询问“你能多好地应对你当前的压力水平”来评估四周内的情境应对情况。采用多水平模型来测试应对方式对情境应对的影响。此外,还评估了性别差异。(=0.03)和(=0.04)对总样本中的情境应对有显著的积极影响。对于女性,对情境应对有显著的积极影响(=0.046)。对于男性,对情境应对有显著的积极影响(=0.001)。女性在SCI量表上的得分高于男性(=0.007)。这些结果表明,不同的应对方式在日常生活中对女性可能比男性更有效。考虑到这一点,针对用户应对方式量身定制的干预措施可能比一般化的干预措施带来更好的应对效果。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Coping Styles and Gender on Situational Coping: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study With the mHealth Application TrackYourStress.应对方式和性别对情境应对的影响:一项使用移动健康应用程序TrackYourStress的生态瞬时评估研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 20;13:913125. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913125. eCollection 2022.
2
Ecological momentary assessment in posttraumatic stress disorder and coping. An eHealth study protocol.创伤后应激障碍与应对中的生态瞬时评估。一项电子健康研究方案。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 Sep 5;10(1):1654064. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1654064. eCollection 2019.
3
Ecological Momentary Assessment of Adolescent Problems, Coping Efficacy, and Mood States Using a Mobile Phone App: An Exploratory Study.使用手机应用程序对青少年问题、应对效能和情绪状态进行生态瞬时评估:一项探索性研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Nov 29;3(4):e51. doi: 10.2196/mental.6361.
4
Exploring the Time Trend of Stress Levels While Using the Crowdsensing Mobile Health Platform, TrackYourStress, and the Influence of Perceived Stress Reactivity: Ecological Momentary Assessment Pilot Study.使用群感移动健康平台 TrackYourStress 时压力水平的时间趋势研究及感知压力反应性的影响:生态瞬时评估初步研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Oct 30;7(10):e13978. doi: 10.2196/13978.
5
Psychometric qualities of the English Coping Scales of the Stress and Coping Inventory in a representative UK sample.英国代表性样本中应激与应对量表的英文应对量表的心理计量学特性。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Feb 2;9(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00528-3.
6
[Multidimensional assessment of coping: validation of the Brief COPE among French population].应对方式的多维评估:法国人群中简易应对方式问卷(Brief COPE)的效度验证
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):507-18.
7
Dispositional and situational coping among individuals with alcohol use disorder.酒精使用障碍个体的特质性应对与情境性应对
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Sep;80:79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
8
How does day-to-day stress appraisal relate to coping among office workers in academia? An ecological momentary assessment study.日常压力评估与学术界办公室职员的应对方式有何关联?一项生态瞬时评估研究。
Stress Health. 2024 Jun;40(3):e3315. doi: 10.1002/smi.3315. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
9
Occurrence of and Reasons for "Missing Events" in Mobile Dietary Assessments: Results From Three Event-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies.移动膳食评估中“缺失事件”的发生和原因:三项基于事件的生态瞬时评估研究的结果。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 14;8(10):e15430. doi: 10.2196/15430.
10
Smartphone App-Based Noncontact Ecological Momentary Assessment With Experienced and Naïve Older Participants: Feasibility Study.基于智能手机应用程序的非接触式生态瞬时评估:针对有经验和无经验的老年参与者的可行性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 8;6(3):e27677. doi: 10.2196/27677.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting coping competence for psychological stressors in nursing training: a controlled pedagogical intervention.在护理培训中提升应对心理压力源的能力:一项对照教学干预研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 27;11:1429541. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1429541. eCollection 2024.
2
Emotional Regulation, Coping, and Resilience in Informal Caregivers: A Network Analysis Approach.非正式照料者的情绪调节、应对方式与心理韧性:一种网络分析方法
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 13;14(8):709. doi: 10.3390/bs14080709.
3
Sex differences in hardiness, coping, and health in new West Point cadets.西点军校新生在心理韧性、应对方式和健康方面的性别差异。
Mil Psychol. 2024 Sep 2;36(5):516-524. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2023.2220643. Epub 2023 Jun 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the Time Trend of Stress Levels While Using the Crowdsensing Mobile Health Platform, TrackYourStress, and the Influence of Perceived Stress Reactivity: Ecological Momentary Assessment Pilot Study.使用群感移动健康平台 TrackYourStress 时压力水平的时间趋势研究及感知压力反应性的影响:生态瞬时评估初步研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Oct 30;7(10):e13978. doi: 10.2196/13978.
2
Broad Coping Repertoire Mediates the Effect of the Combined Behavioral Intervention on Alcohol Outcomes in the COMBINE Study: An Application of Latent Class Mediation.广泛的应对策略在 COMBINE 研究中调节联合行为干预对酒精结果的影响:潜在类别中介分析的应用。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018 Mar;79(2):199-207. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.199.
3
A Randomized Controlled Trial on Functional Relaxation as an Adjunct to Psychoeducation for Stress.一项关于功能放松作为压力心理教育辅助手段的随机对照试验。
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 27;8:1553. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01553. eCollection 2017.
4
Addressing the treatment gap: A key challenge for extending evidence-based psychosocial interventions.解决治疗差距:推广基于证据的心理社会干预的关键挑战。
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Jan;88:7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.004.
5
The Wisdom to Know the Difference.明辨之智。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Dec;27(12):1651-1659. doi: 10.1177/0956797616669086. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
6
A Stage Model of Stress and Disease.压力与疾病的阶段模型。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Jul;11(4):456-63. doi: 10.1177/1745691616646305.
7
Experience sampling and ecological momentary assessment studies in psychopharmacology: A systematic review.精神药理学中的经验抽样和生态瞬时评估研究:一项系统综述。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Nov;25(11):1853-64. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
8
Mood disorders in everyday life: a systematic review of experience sampling and ecological momentary assessment studies.日常生活中的情绪障碍:经验取样和生态瞬时评估研究的系统综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Aug;32(6):510-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.05.007. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
9
The Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale: measurement invariance, stability, and validity in three countries.知觉压力反应量表:在三个国家的测量不变性、稳定性和有效性。
Psychol Assess. 2011 Mar;23(1):80-94. doi: 10.1037/a0021148.
10
Using experience sampling methods/ecological momentary assessment (ESM/EMA) in clinical assessment and clinical research: introduction to the special section.在临床评估和临床研究中使用经验采样方法/生态瞬时评估(ESM/EMA):特刊介绍。
Psychol Assess. 2009 Dec;21(4):457-62. doi: 10.1037/a0017653.