Wright Nat M J, Sheard Laura, Tompkins Charlotte N E, Adams Clive E, Allgar Victoria L, Oldham Nicola S
Centre for Research in Primary Care, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9PL, UK.
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Jan 8;8:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-3.
Many drug users present to primary care requesting detoxification from illicit opiates. There are a number of detoxification agents but no recommended drug of choice. The purpose of this study is to compare buprenorphine with dihydrocodeine for detoxification from illicit opiates in primary care.
Open label randomised controlled trial in NHS Primary Care (General Practices), Leeds, UK. Sixty consenting adults using illicit opiates received either daily sublingual buprenorphine or daily oral dihydrocodeine. Reducing regimens for both interventions were at the discretion of prescribing doctor within a standard regimen of not more than 15 days. Primary outcome was abstinence from illicit opiates at final prescription as indicated by a urine sample. Secondary outcomes during detoxification period and at three and six months post detoxification were recorded.
Only 23% completed the prescribed course of detoxification medication and gave a urine sample on collection of their final prescription. Risk of non-completion of detoxification was reduced if allocated buprenorphine (68% vs 88%, RR 0.58 CI 0.35-0.96, p = 0.065). A higher proportion of people allocated to buprenorphine provided a clean urine sample compared with those who received dihydrocodeine (21% vs 3%, RR 2.06 CI 1.33-3.21, p = 0.028). People allocated to buprenorphine had fewer visits to professional carers during detoxification and more were abstinent at three months (10 vs 4, RR 1.55 CI 0.96-2.52) and six months post detoxification (7 vs 3, RR 1.45 CI 0.84-2.49).
Informative randomised trials evaluating routine care within the primary care setting are possible amongst drug using populations. This small study generates unique data on commonly used treatment regimens.
许多吸毒者到基层医疗保健机构寻求戒除非法阿片类药物。有多种戒毒药物,但没有推荐的首选药物。本研究的目的是比较丁丙诺啡与二氢可待因在基层医疗保健中用于戒除非法阿片类药物的效果。
在英国利兹的国民保健服务基层医疗保健机构(全科诊所)进行开放标签随机对照试验。60名同意参与的使用非法阿片类药物的成年人,分别每日接受舌下含服丁丙诺啡或口服二氢可待因。两种干预措施的减量方案由开处方的医生在不超过15天的标准方案内自行决定。主要结局指标是最后一次处方时通过尿液样本检测显示戒除非法阿片类药物。记录戒毒期间以及戒毒后3个月和6个月的次要结局指标。
只有23%的人完成了规定疗程的戒毒药物治疗,并在最后一次处方时提供了尿液样本。如果被分配使用丁丙诺啡,戒毒未完成的风险会降低(68%对88%,相对危险度0.58,可信区间0.35 - 0.96,p = 0.065)。与接受二氢可待因的人相比,被分配使用丁丙诺啡的人中提供尿液检测呈阴性样本的比例更高(21%对3%,相对危险度2.06,可信区间1.33 - 3.21,p = 0.028)。被分配使用丁丙诺啡的人在戒毒期间就诊于专业护理人员的次数较少,且在戒毒后3个月(10人对4人,相对危险度1.55,可信区间0.96 - 2.52)和6个月(7人对3人,相对危险度1.45,可信区间0.84 - 2.49)时戒除毒品的人数更多。
在吸毒人群中进行评估基层医疗保健机构常规护理的信息丰富的随机试验是可行的。这项小型研究产生了关于常用治疗方案的独特数据。