Faris C, Koury E, Philpott J, Sharma S, Tolley N, Narula A
Department of Otolaryngology, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
J Laryngol Otol. 2007 Sep;121(9):869-71. doi: 10.1017/S0022215107005324. Epub 2007 Jan 9.
Two methods can be used to assess the intra-cuff pressure of tracheostomy tubes: digital palpation of the pilot balloon and use of a hand-held manometer. We conducted a telephone survey to determine the prevalence of both methods in intensive care units within 21 teaching hospitals across the United Kingdom. Forty-two per cent of the intensive care units surveyed used a protocol for monitoring cuff pressure with a manometer.A study to compare these two methods, using the manometer as the reference standard, was then carried out. The cuff pressure was correctly estimated in pre-inflated tracheostomy tubes, in a tracheal model, by 61 per cent of a cross-section of intensive care unit and otolaryngology staff.Using pilot balloon palpation is inaccurate and leaves a significant proportion of patients at risk of tracheal injury. We advocate the wider availability of hand-held pressure manometers in intensive care units and the institution of protocols for monitoring cuff pressure for any patient with a tracheostomy tube with an inflated cuff in situ.
通过触诊指示球囊进行数字 palpation 以及使用手持式压力计。我们进行了一项电话调查,以确定英国 21 家教学医院的重症监护病房中这两种方法的使用 prevalence。接受调查的重症监护病房中有 42% 使用压力计监测套囊压力的方案。随后开展了一项以压力计作为参考标准来比较这两种方法的研究。在气管模型中,重症监护病房和耳鼻喉科工作人员中有 61% 能正确估计预先充气的气管造口管的套囊压力。使用指示球囊触诊不准确,会使很大一部分患者面临气管损伤风险。我们主张在重症监护病房更广泛地配备手持式压力计,并为任何套囊已充气就位的气管造口管患者制定监测套囊压力的方案。